首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Acceptable nutrient concentrations in agriculturally dominant landscapes: A comparison of nutrient criteria approaches for Nebraska rivers and streams
【24h】

Acceptable nutrient concentrations in agriculturally dominant landscapes: A comparison of nutrient criteria approaches for Nebraska rivers and streams

机译:农业优势景观中可接受的养分浓度:内布拉斯加州河流和河流的养分标准方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Developing numeric nutrient criteria for streams has been exceedingly complex due to uncertain background concentrations and uncertain impacts to water quality. In this study, I empirically examine the utility of multiple criteria for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) criteria for rivers and streams of Nebraska, USA using: (1) whole-population nutrient percentiles; (2) reference stream percentiles; (3) model predicted estimates from relationships between nutrients and anthropogenic land usage; and (4) stressor-response modeling of nutrients and invertebrate and fish assemblages. I predicted that criteria developed for Nebraska would be greater than the criteria recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency for the associated nutrient ecoregions because the new criteria would be derived from streams only within this agriculturally-dominated state. Also, I predicted that criteria based on responses of biota would be higher than those based on the frequency distribution of nutrient data because biota have been filtered by their ability to endure higher nutrient concentrations. The percentage of rowcrop agriculture was responsible for the vast majority of land usage, and TN and TP were predictable by rowcrop. Nutrient ecoregions did not appear to be particularly useful in Nebraska. EPA recommendations for TP were lower than any of the new criteria we developed (from 113 to 599 μg/l) and those for TN were almost always lower than new criteria (from 552 to 2352 μg/l). Relationships of nutrients to biotic integrity were weak or non-existent; TN was not among the best three predictors of invertebrate or fish metrics and TP was only a good predictor of the pollution tolerance of fish, and this criterion was much higher than EPA recommendations (599 μg/l) and criteria based on percentiles and land usage. I discuss the applicability of criteria to agriculturally-intense streams in Nebraska.
机译:由于不确定的背景浓度和不确定的水质影响,为河流制定数字化的营养标准非常复杂。在这项研究中,我使用以下方法对美国内布拉斯加州河流和溪流的总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)多个标准的效用进行了检验:(1)全人口营养百分位; (2)参考流百分位; (3)根据养分与人为土地利用之间的关系建立预测预测模型; (4)营养物,无脊椎动物和鱼类组合的应激反应模型。我预测针对内布拉斯加州制定的标准将比美国环境保护局针对相关营养生态区建议的标准更高,因为新的标准将仅来自该农业主导州内的河流。另外,我预测基于生物群反应的标准将高于基于营养物数据频率分布的标准,因为生物群已被其承受较高营养物浓度的能力所过滤。耕作农业的百分比占土地使用的绝大部分,而TN和TP可以通过耕作预测。在内布拉斯加州,营养生态区似乎没有特别有用。 EPA关于TP的建议低于我们制定的任何新标准(从113到599μg/ l),而TN的建议几乎总是低于新标准(从552到2352μg/ l)。营养与生物完整性的关系微弱或不存在; TN并非无脊椎动物或鱼类指标的三大预测指标之一,而TP仅是鱼类耐污染性的良好预测指标,该标准远远高于EPA的建议(599μg/ l)和基于百分位数和土地使用的标准。我讨论了标准对内布拉斯加州农业密集流的适用性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2014年第10期|355-363|共9页
  • 作者

    Thomas Heatherly Ⅱ;

  • 作者单位

    Water Quality Division, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, 1200 'N' Street, Suite 400, Lincoln, NE 68509, USA,School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska Lincoln, 3100 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA,Departamento de Ecologia, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rua Sao Francisco Xavier 524, Maracana, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20550-013, Brazil;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Streams; Invertebrates; Fish; Nutrient criteria; Agriculture;

    机译:氮;磷;溪流;无脊椎动物;鱼;营养标准;农业;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号