...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >The impacts of agricultural payments on groundwater quality: Spatial analysis on the case of Slovenia
【24h】

The impacts of agricultural payments on groundwater quality: Spatial analysis on the case of Slovenia

机译:农业支出对地下水质量的影响:以斯洛文尼亚为例的空间分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The European Common Agricultural Policy still follows its primary goals, i.e. quality food at affordable prices and a decent standard of living for farmers, fifty years after its adoption. Moreover, this policy adapts to the changing needs of society and the new challenges, mostly preservation of the environment, nature and biodiversity in rural areas. Although the Common Agricultural Policy receives the largest share of European budget, the funds are decreasing over time, especially direct payments, which aim to provide basic income support to farmers in the European Union. On the other hand, agri-environmental payments are gaining importance. Policy decision-makers should be interested in the question of impacts of growing eco-conditionality of agricultural spending. New insights would help them to be successful in achieving the goals of sustainable agriculture. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the impacts of production support payments and rural development payments on the quality of groundwater. We use the small EU country Slovenia as an example. The baseline indicators are the level of nitrates and pesticides in groundwater, while the impacts were estimated using spatial error model. The results show that direct payments, coupled subsidies and investment grants raise the level of pesticides in groundwater, but do not have any statistically significant impact on the level of nitrates in groundwater. Furthermore, we did not find any statistically significant effects of agri-environmental payments on decrease Of groundwater pollution with nitrates. However, our findings revealed that agri-environmental payments are effective in reducing pesticides in groundwater, although only to a limited extent. These results imply a problem of insufficient targeting of agri-environmental measures on the one hand, and suggest that greening of direct payments is necessary and entirely justified. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:《欧洲共同农业政策》仍然遵循其主要目标,即在采用五十年后,以可承受的价格提供优质食品,并为农民提供体面的生活水平。此外,这项政策适应了社会不断变化的需求和新的挑战,这些挑战主要是保护农村地区的环境,自然和生物多样性。尽管《共同农业政策》在欧洲预算中所占份额最大,但资金却随着时间而减少,尤其是直接付款,其目的是为欧盟的农民提供基本的收入支持。另一方面,农业环境支付越来越重要。政策决策者应该对农业支出日益增长的生态条件产生的影响感兴趣。新的见解将帮助他们成功实现可持续农业目标。本文的目的是评估生产支持支出和农村发展支出对地下水质量的影响。我们以欧盟小国斯洛文尼亚为例。基线指标是地下水中硝酸盐和农药的水平,而影响是使用空间误差模型估算的。结果表明,直接付款,补贴和投资赠款增加了地下水中农药的含量,但对地下水中硝酸盐的含量没有统计学上的显着影响。此外,我们没有发现农业环境支付对减少硝酸盐对地下水的污染有任何统计学上的显着影响。但是,我们的研究结果表明,尽管仅在有限的范围内,但农业环境付款对减少地下水中的农药有效。这些结果一方面暗示了农业环境措施的针对性不足的问题,并且表明直接支付的绿色化是必要且完全合理的。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号