首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Relocation or reallocation: Impacts of differentiated energy saving regulation on manufacturing industries in China
【24h】

Relocation or reallocation: Impacts of differentiated energy saving regulation on manufacturing industries in China

机译:迁移或重新分配:差异化的节能法规对中国制造业的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unilateral tightening of environmental regulation is often considered to cause regulated industries to locate at places with lower compliance cost. The pollution haven effect may be offset, however, when endogenous technical change and factor reallocation can compensate increased compliance cost. This paper identifies the overall effects on industrial activities from provincially differentiated regulation of energy saving in China. Econometric specifications take into account the workings of different policy instruments, quantity and revenue-based measurement of output, policy-induced price effects, and alternative measurement of productivity and competitiveness. Results indicate that an introduction of energy-saving policies leads to loss of output and productivity in energy-intensive industries initially, which is passed on to other industries via markets of capital and energy-intensive goods. Under higher regulation, energy-intensive industries become more capital-intensive, regain productivity more quickly, and increase export rates; other industries become more labor-intensive, recover more slowly, and decrease export rates. Through capital investment and factor reallocation, China's policy has been effective in improving industrial energy efficiency without causing competitive loss or carbon leakage. An incentive-based instrument of differential electricity prices leads to similar effects on industries, implying the possibility for more efficient policy-making. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:人们通常认为,单方面收紧环境法规会使受管制的行业位于合规成本较低的地方。但是,当内源性技术变化和要素重新分配可以补偿增加的合规成本时,污染天堂的影响可能会被抵消。本文从中国省级差异化节能法规中确定了对工业活动的总体影响。计量经济学规范考虑了不同政策工具的工作原理,基于数量和收入的产出衡量,政策导致的价格效应以及生产率和竞争力的替代衡量。结果表明,实施节能政策最初会导致高耗能行业的产出和生产率下降,然后通过资本和高耗能商品市场传递给其他行业。在更高的监管下,能源密集型产业变得更加资本密集,更快地恢复生产力,并提高出口率。其他行业的劳动密集程度更高,复苏速度更慢,出口率下降。通过资本投资和要素再分配,中国的政策在不引起竞争性损失或碳泄漏的情况下有效地提高了工业能源效率。以激励为基础的电价差工具对行业产生类似的影响,这意味着有可能进行更有效的决策。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号