...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Comparing energy and material efficiency rebound effects: an exploration of scenarios in the GEM-E3 macroeconomic model
【24h】

Comparing energy and material efficiency rebound effects: an exploration of scenarios in the GEM-E3 macroeconomic model

机译:比较能源和材料效率反弹效应:宝石E3宏观经济模型中的情景探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses the GEM-E3 macroeconomic computable general equilibrium model to calculate the magnitude of greenhouse gas (GhG) emission rebound effects across a range of efficiency scenarios in the automotive sector supply chain. The scenarios are technically feasible as they are designed using bottom up information from the iron and steel industry. Rebound effects occur when efficiency improvements reduce prices, stimulating demand and offsetting some of the environmental benefits that would otherwise be had. This paper allows energy, material and product-service efficiency rebound effects to be compared for the first time. The results suggest that there is a greater risk of rebound effects for downstream emissions abatement strategies that save embodied emissions: 85% of the emissions savings in the product-service efficiency scenario and 77% of emissions in the material efficiency scenario are offset by economy-wide rebound effects. This compares to 7% in the energy efficiency scenario. These findings show that, in the current policy environment in which GhG emissions remain relative unconstrained, improvements in material efficiency that are particularly good at spurring growth are also likely to carry the greatest rebound effects. The conclusions of this paper are not purely dependent on the chosen macroeconomic model, but are a function of the underlying value structure along supply chains: downstream efficiency improvements that save embodied emissions involve greater potential monetary savings per unit GhG avoided, spurring rebound effects.
机译:本文采用GEM-E3宏观经济可计算普通均衡模型计算汽车扇区供应链中一系列效率场景的温室气体(GHG)排放反弹效应的大小。这种情况在技术上是可行的,因为它们是使用钢铁工业的自下而上信息设计的。当效率改善降低价格,刺激需求和抵消其他一些环境效益时,会出现反弹效应。本文允许第一次比较能源,材料和产品 - 服务效率反弹效果。结果表明,对下游排放的反策略存在重击效应的风险,以节省体现的排放量:85%的排放量在产品 - 服务效率方案中节省了77%的物质效率情景中的排放量抵消了经济 - 宽篮板效应。这与能效方案中的7%相比。这些调查结果表明,在当前的政策环境中,温室气体排放仍然不受约束的,特别擅长刺激生长的材料效率的改善也可能携带最大的反弹效应。本文的结论纯粹不依赖于所选择的宏观经济模型,而是沿供应链的潜在价值结构的函数:节省体现排放的下游效率改进涉及每单位GHG避免更大的潜在货币储蓄。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号