首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?
【24h】

Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?

机译:贸易自由化是否会导致全球经济中的环境负担转移?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does trade liberalization lead to the outsourcing of pollution from industrialized countries to developing countries? According to the pollution-haven hypothesis, international trade is a key channel through which richer countries can geographically dissociate consumption from production of goods. We examine whether and how trade liberalization via preferential trade agreements (PTAs) facilitates the shifting of consumption-based environmental burdens from developed countries (via imports) to poorer countries (via exports). Based on panel data analysis of 183 countries from 1987 to 2013 we find partial evidence for trade-induced environmental burden shifting. While we observe an increase in footprint exports from low-income countries when these countries liberalize trade, this is not matched by an increase in footprint imports of high-income countries. Our results also show that environmental clauses in PTAs and participation in international environmental agreements do not influence the relationship between trade liberalization and ecological footprint movements. However, domestic institutions have a significant effect on the trade-induced distribution of environmental burdens. These findings suggest that PTAs as a policy tool for trade liberalization are, per se, unlikely to induce exploitation of low-income countries' natural capital by wealthier nations. However, they suggest that political incentives inherent to democratic institutions encourage environmental burden shifting.
机译:贸易自由化是否会导致污染从工业化国家外包给发展中国家?根据污染预防假说,国际贸易是重要的渠道,富裕国家可以通过该渠道在地理上将消费与商品生产分离。我们研究了通过优惠贸易协定(PTA)进行的贸易自由化是否以及如何促进基于消费的环境负担从发达国家(通过进口)转移到较贫穷国家(通过出口)。基于1987年至2013年对183个国家的面板数据分析,我们发现了贸易导致的环境负担转移的部分证据。当我们观察到低收入国家开放贸易后,低收入国家的脚印出口增加了,而高收入国家的脚印进口却没有增加。我们的结果还表明,PTA中的环境条款和参与国际环境协议不会影响贸易自由化与生态足迹运动之间的关系。但是,国内机构对贸易导致的环境负担分配产生重大影响。这些发现表明,作为贸易自由化的政策工具,PTA本身不太可能引起较富裕国家对低收入国家的自然资本的剥削。但是,他们认为,民主制度固有的政治激励机制鼓励转移环境负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号