首页> 外文期刊>Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory >The negation of power: from structuration theory to the politics of the Third Way
【24h】

The negation of power: from structuration theory to the politics of the Third Way

机译:权力的否定:从结构理论到第三条道路的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the last two decades Europe witnessed a despairing zeitgeist. Neo-liberalism lived its golden age and dictated its iron laws. Right-wing populism had come to stay. What had gone wrong with left-wing politics? At one with Chantal Mouffe, we claim that the programmatic turn of social democracy towards the Third Way has been fateful. We theoretically query the Third Way by analyzing the work of its perhaps foremost intellectual, Anthony Giddens. We trace the evolution of Giddens' thought from his theory of structuration over his vision of modernity to the formulation of the politics of the Third Way and disclose a tight connection between social theory and political project. While in Giddens' view human agency functions as the major source of social change, he disregards collective forms of contestation as unrealistic. This holds even more under modern conditions, where immanent possibilities of emancipation have been rendered possible and where the task of politics consists in ameliorating the individual's self-fulfillment by governing the almost unsteerable modern world. From here it is but a small step to Third Way politics. Giddens regards the latter as the form of rational governance which is due to replace the outdated quarrels over the good society. Whereas in our article we come to terms with some of Giddens' insights, it is on the whole at odds with both his theoretical and political endeavors. In this vein, in our discussion we flesh out an alternative vision of power and politics, utterly committed to radical democracy. Albeit the utopian moment is not to be found in this framework either, at least it remains an ever-present horizon.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy, hegemony, political theory, post-structuralism, power, reflexive modernity, structuration theory, Third WayRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.687694
机译:在过去的二十年中,欧洲见证了绝望的时代精神。新自由主义度过了黄金时代,并决定了其铁律。右翼民粹主义得以保留。左翼政治出了什么问题?在与尚塔尔·穆菲(Chantal Mouffe)的合影中,我们声称,社会民主主义向第三条道路的计划转变是注定的。从理论上讲,我们通过分析可能是最重要的知识分子安东尼·吉登斯的作品来质疑“第三种方式”。我们追溯了吉登斯思想的演变,从他关于现代性的结构化理论到第三种道路政治的表述,并揭示了社会理论与政治计划之间的紧密联系。在吉登斯看来,人的代理是社会变革的主要动力,但他无视集体竞争的形式是不现实的。在现代条件下,这一点尤为重要,在这种情况下,解放的内在可能性已成为可能,政治任务是通过治理几乎不可操纵的现代世界来改善个人的自我实现。从这里开始,这只是通往第三方向政治的一小步。吉登斯将后者视为理性治理的形式,这是为了取代对良好社会的过时争吵。尽管在我们的文章中我们对吉登斯的一些见解表示赞同,但总体而言,这与他的理论和政治努力均不一致。因此,在我们的讨论中,我们充实了对权力和政治的另一种看法,完全致力于激进民主。尽管在这个框架中也没有找到乌托邦时刻,但至少它仍然是一个永远存在的视界。 addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2012.687694

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号