...
首页> 外文期刊>Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education >Art for a few: exclusions and misrecognitions in higher education admissions practices
【24h】

Art for a few: exclusions and misrecognitions in higher education admissions practices

机译:一些人的艺术:高等教育招生实践中的排斥和误认

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, we examine the policy and practice of admissions to art and design courses in the context of the UK widening participation (WP) agenda. We draw on our qualitative study of admissions practices funded by the National Arts Learning Network (NALN). To provide context and background, we outline and critique WP policy discourses, focusing on issues of admissions and access, followed by an analysis of our research data, drawing on the conceptual tools of subjectivity and misrecognition. In using this analytical approach, we attempt to expose the subtle and insidious workings of inequality and exclusion in processes of selection. We argue that admissions policy problematically conflates notions of ‘fairness’ and ‘transparency’ and fails to address complex socio-cultural inequalities in processes of recognition of the potential student-subject of art and design. We show how a focus on individual practices rather than on policy discourses and processes of subjective construction helps to hide the ways that ‘potential’ is constructed in ways that privilege and recognize particular student subjectivities, whilst excluding Others.View full textDownload full textKeywordsadmissions, widening participation, policy discourse, subjectivity, misrecognition, exclusionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.620753
机译:在本文中,我们将在英国扩大参与(WP)议程的背景下研究艺术和设计课程入学的政策和做法。我们利用由国家艺术学习网络(NALN)资助的招生实践的定性研究。为了提供背景和背景,我们概述和批判了可湿性粉剂政策的论述,重点是录取和获取的问题,然后利用主观性和误认的概念工具对我们的研究数据进行分析。在使用这种分析方法时,我们试图揭示选择过程中不平等和排斥的微妙和隐蔽的工作。我们认为,招生政策会令人困惑地混淆“公平”和“透明”的概念,并且在承认潜在的艺术和设计学生主体的过程中未能解决复杂的社会文化不平等问题。我们将展示如何将重点放在个人实践上,而不是在政策性论述和主观建构过程上,帮助隐藏“潜在”构建方式,从而以特权和承认特定学生的主体性的方式,而排除其他主体。查看全文下载全文textKeywords入场,扩大参与范围,政策讨论,主观性,误解,排除“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.620753

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号