首页> 外文期刊>Disability & Society >Regranting identity to the outgraced - narratives of persons with learning disabilities: methodological considerations
【24h】

Regranting identity to the outgraced - narratives of persons with learning disabilities: methodological considerations

机译:超越自我的认同-学习障碍者的叙述:方法论上的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Good research should be relevant and useful, it may even be enlightening or symbolic, but it can also be emancipatory. Qualitative research can be useful in challenging structures, policies and practices that disempower and marginalize segments of the population. However, could it be that the empowerment of the participant ends where the weakness of the researcher begins? In qualitative studies the researcher seems to have a number of favourite interviews. In a study on the relational and sexual experiences of 46 people with learning disabilities, 12 interviews were withdrawn from the general data on the basis of lack of relevance. It is important to re-examine why the voice of some people fell out of the in-depth analysis and whether this was justified. In this article some methodological opportunities and pitfalls to re-grant identity to these silenced narratives are considered and discussed.
机译:好的研究应该是相关的和有用的,它甚至可能是启迪性的或象征性的,但也可以是解放性的。定性研究可用于挑战有挑战性的结构,政策和做法,这些结构,政策和做法会剥夺人口的权利并使其边缘化。但是,可能是参与者的授权在研究者的弱点开始时就结束了吗?在定性研究中,研究人员似乎有许多喜欢的访谈。在一项针对46名学习障碍者的性关系和性经历的研究中,由于缺乏相关性,从一般数据中撤回了12次访谈。必须重新检查为什么某些人的声音没有从深入分析中消失,以及这是否合理。在本文中,我们考虑并讨论了为这些沉默的叙述重新赋予认同的一些方法学机会和陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号