首页> 外文期刊>Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie >Is Society-Centered Moral Theory a Contemporary Version of Natural Law Theory?
【24h】

Is Society-Centered Moral Theory a Contemporary Version of Natural Law Theory?

机译:以社会为中心的道德理论是自然法理论的当代版本吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

David Braybrooke argues that the core of the natural law theory of Thomas nAquinas survived in the work of Hobbes, Locke, Hume, and Rousseau. Much to my nsurprise, Braybrooke argues as well that David Copp’s society-centered moral theory is na secular version of this same natural law theory. Braybrooke makes a good case that nthere is an important idea about morality that is shared by the great philosophers in his ngroup and that this idea is also found in Copp’s work. The idea is captured by the Func-ntionalist Thesis, the thesis that moral propositions are made true by facts about what, ngiven the nature of human beings and their circumstances, enables people to live to-ngether in thriving communities. I argue that Copp can accept Braybrooke’s suggestion nand use it to improve his formulation of the basic idea of the society-centered theory.
机译:大卫·布雷布鲁克(David Braybrooke)认为,托马斯·阿奎那(Thomas nAquinas)的自然法理论的核心在霍布斯,洛克,休H和卢梭的著作中得以幸存。令我惊讶的是,布雷布鲁克(Braybrooke)也认为,大卫·科普(David Copp)的以社会为中心的道德理论是该自然法理论的自然版本。布雷布鲁克(Braybrooke)提出了一个很好的例子,即这是一个伟大的道德观念,被伟大的哲学家们所认同,并且在科普的著作中也能找到。功能主义论点抓住了这个想法,该论点是道德命题是通过以下事实而实现的:关于什么使人的本性及其境遇得以实现,使人们能够共同生活在繁荣的社区中。我认为,科普可以接受布雷布鲁克的建议,并以此来改善他对以社会为中心的理论的基本思想的表述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号