首页> 外文期刊>Research & Politics >Why do citizens (not) support democratic innovations? The role of instrumental motivations in support for participatory budgeting
【24h】

Why do citizens (not) support democratic innovations? The role of instrumental motivations in support for participatory budgeting

机译:为什么公民(不)支持民主创新? 工具动机在对参与式预算的支持中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Why do citizens (not) support democratic innovations? Existing research shows that citizens mostly support such new ways of involving citizens in policy-making for instrumental reasons: the more a democratic innovation leads to outcomes they favour, the more likely they are to express support for it. However, it remains ambiguous why citizens care so much about favourable outcomes. This study disentangles the effect of outcome favourability on support for democratic innovations by testing two mechanisms: self-interest and sociotropy. It relies on three survey experiments on Dutch citizens’ support for a local democratic innovation (participatory budgeting) ( N = 2,491). The results confirm that outcome favourability is important in explaining citizens’ support for participatory budgets (Study 1). We find evidence for both self-interest (Study 2) and sociotropy (Study 3) as drivers of the effect and present preliminary evidence that self-interest may trump sociotropy in citizens’ evaluations of democratic innovations.
机译:为什么公民(不)支持民主创新?现有研究表明,公民主要支持涉及公民的新方法,以实现乐器的原因:民主创新导致他们有利的结果,他们就是表达对其的支持。然而,为什么公民关心有利的结果仍然模棱两可。本研究通过检测两种机制:自我利益和社会侵害,解开了结果消费者对民主创新支持的影响。它依赖于三项调查实验对荷兰公民对当地民主创新的支持(参与式预算编制)(n = 2,491)。结果证实,结果消费品在解释公民对参与性预算的支持方面非常重要(研究1)。我们发现自身利益(学习2)和Sociotropy(研究3)作为效果的促进者,并提出了初步证据,以至于自身利益可能在公民对民主创新的评价中胜过社会效果的初步证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号