...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Moving Beyond a Social Constructionist Analytic
【24h】

Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Moving Beyond a Social Constructionist Analytic

机译:Foucauldian话语分析:超越社交建筑师分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Although social constructionism (SC) and Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA) are well established constructionist analytical methods, this article propose that Foucauldian discourse analysis is more useful for qualitative data analysis as it examines social legitimacy. While the SC is able to illuminate how the “meaning” of our social action is constructed through our everyday interaction in socio-cultural and political contexts, questions emerge that are beyond the scope of the SC. These questions are concerned with understanding how the construction of “meaning” is connected to the power imbalance in our society, as well as how a particular version of reality comes to us as truth, having excluded other versions. Moreover, SC does not distinguish between successful and unsuccessful/marginalized claims. This article reflects on how using FDA addresses weaknesses in SC when used in qualitative data analysis, using specific examples from different literature.
机译:虽然社会建设主义(SC)和Foucauldian话语分析(FDA)是建立的建设主义分析方法,但本文提出了福科司司族话语分析对定性数据分析更有用,因为它审查了社会合法性。 虽然SC能够阐明我们社会行动的“意义”是如何通过我们的日常文化和政治背景下的日常互动构成的,但出现的问题超出了SC的范围。 这些问题涉及了解“意义”的建设如何与我们社会的权力不平衡相关,以及特定版本的现实如何成为真理,被排除在外。 此外,SC不区分成功和不成功/边缘化的索赔。 本文反映了使用不同文献的具体示例在定性数据分析中使用FDA在SC中使用FDA的弱点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号