首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes After Exposure to Three Different Instructional Strategies in Applied Anatomy
【24h】

Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes After Exposure to Three Different Instructional Strategies in Applied Anatomy

机译:在接触应用解剖学三种不同教学策略后的学生的看法和态度

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The advancements of technologies have developed anatomical education into a new era. The study aims to assess medical students' performance and overall satisfaction who used the anatomage table and plastinated specimens for the teaching and learning anatomy courses.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted on students of the first-year college of medicine at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU). Students were randomly distributed equally into three groups A, B, and C. All groups were taken two sessions of lectures for one hour each. Each lecture was followed by a practical session of two hours. Group A learned with the "Anatomage" table and Group B learned the same topics on plastinated specimens. Group C was learning on both plastinated specimens and the "Anatomage" table. The objective structured practical examination was given to all students immediately after the practical sessions. A structured questionnaire was given to each group to determine the students' views on the educational methods.Results:There was a statistically significant difference between the means of the total scale scores for the three teaching methods, where students expressed a higher attitude towards both strategies for teaching in comparison to the anatomage table and plastinated models for teaching, where the means were 18±4.4, 18.3±4.6, 20.4±5.6, respectively, F=12.6 and P=0.0001. There were higher and positive students' attitudes regarding the five statements in favor of both models teaching compared to anatomage table and plastinated model teaching alone.Conclusion:The first-year medical students have valued the combination of anatomage table and plastinated prosections in learning and assessing anatomy education at the undergraduate level. The advantages outweigh the limitation of these educational tools.? 2021 Bin Abdulrahman et al.
机译:背景:技术的进步使解剖学教育成为一个新的时代。该研究旨在评估医生的表现和整体满意,谁利用Anatomage表和塑料标本的教学和学习解剖课程。方法:在IMAM Mohammad的第一年医学院学生进行了横断面研究IBN SAUD伊斯兰大学(IMSIU)。学生同样随机分布成三组A,B和C.所有群体每组讲座每一个讲座每一个小时。每次讲座都是两小时的实际会议。与“Anatomage”表和B组学习的学习者学会了在塑料标本上获得了同样的主题。 C组在塑料标本和“Anatomage”表上是学习的。客观结构化实际检查是在实际课程后立即给予所有学生的。对每个小组的结构化问卷确定学生对教育方法的看法。结果:三种教学方法的总规模分数的手段之间存在统计学意义,学生对两种策略表达更高的态度用于教学与教学和教学的塑性模型相比,该方法分别为18±4.4,18.3±4.6,20.4±5.6,F = 12.6和P = 0.0001。与单独的Anatomage表和塑料式模型教学相比,有更多的陈述有利于模特教学的五个陈述的态度。结论:第一年的医学生对学习和评估中的植物阶层和塑性偏转的组合有价值本科级别的解剖学教育。这些优点超过了这些教育工具的限制。 2021 Bin Abdulrahman等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号