首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:基于团队的学习与课程学习对临床推理和课堂参与的比较:群体随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

The lecture-based learning (LBL) implemented in most Indonesian nursing/midwifery schools underlies the students’ lack of ability in clinical reasoning. Team-based learning (TBL) was proposed to improve the students’ ability in clinical reasoning as it is applying a course concept of real complex scenarios. In this study, we aimed to assess and compare the effects of TBL and LBL of postpartum hemorrhage topics on the clinical reasoning and classroom engagement of midwifery students in Indonesia. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of TBL and LBL. The unit was schools and random allocation was conducted using a simple random sampling method (i.e., coin flipping). There was 1 cluster in the intervention group (n?=?62 students) and 1 cluster in the control group (n?=?53 students). The students in the intervention group participated in a TBL class (90?min) three times, whereas the students in the control group attended an LBL class on postpartum hemorrhage topics. The primary outcome was the clinical reasoning on postpartum hemorrhage score measured at pre-test, post-test, and 2 weeks post-test. The secondary outcome was Classroom Engagement Survey (CES) score measured after each class finished. We used an unpaired t-test to evaluate the differences between the two groups. The baseline characteristics of the participants were compared using standardized difference. We evaluated a total of 115 participants. Regarding the baseline characteristics, there was a small difference in the age, Grade Point Average and knowledge at pre-test between the intervention and control groups. The mean clinical reasoning on postpartum hemorrhage scores were significantly higher in the TBL students than in the LBL students at post-test (p??.001; Cohen’s d?=?1.41) and 2 weeks post-test (p??.001; Cohen’s d?=?1.50). The CES showed a significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. TBL is an effective learning method for enhancing the clinical reasoning ability of students. This learning method allows for more independent and active learning. Having a strong background knowledge, and discussing cases comprehensively with peers can sharpen the clinical reasoning ability of students.
机译:在大多数印度尼西亚护理/助产学校实施的基于讲座的学习(LBL)基础是学生缺乏临床推理的能力。提出基于团队的学习(TBL),以提高学生在临床推理中的能力,因为它正在应用真正的复杂情景的课程概念。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估和比较产后出血主题TBL和LBL的影响对印度尼西亚助理学生的临床推理和课堂参与。我们进行了一个集群随机对照试验,以比较TBL和LBL的影响。该单位是学校,使用简单的随机采样方法进行随机分配(即,硬币翻转)。干预组中有1个群集(N?=?62学生)和控制组中的1个群集(n?= 53名学生)。干预组的学生参加了一个TBL级(90?分钟)三次,而对照组的学生参加了产后出血主题的LBL课程。主要结果是在测试后,测试后测量的产后出血评分和测试后2周测量的临床推理。次要结果是课堂参与调查(CES)评分在每班完成后测量。我们使用了未配对的T检验来评估两组之间的差异。使用标准化差异进行比较参与者的基线特征。我们评估了115名参与者。关于基线特征,在干预和对照组之间的预测中存在较小的年龄,等级点和知识差异。 TBL学生的产后出血评分的平均临床推理比在测试后的LBL学生中显着高(P?001; COHEN的D?=?1.41)和测试后2周(P?&lt ;?。001;科恩的d?=?1.50)。干预组的CES显着高于对照组。 TBL是提高学生临床推理能力的有效学习方法。这种学习方法允许更独立和活动的学习。拥有强大的背景知识,并与同行全面讨论案例可以提高学生的临床推理能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号