首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Undisclosed probing into decision-making capacity: a dilemma in secondary care
【24h】

Undisclosed probing into decision-making capacity: a dilemma in secondary care

机译:未公开的决策能力探讨:次级护理中的困境

获取原文
       

摘要

The assessment of patients’ decision-making capacity is ubiquitous in contemporary healthcare. This paper examines the ethics of undisclosed probing of capacity by psychiatrists. The discussion will refer to the law in England and Wales, though the highlighted issues are likely to be relevant in similar jurisdictions. Decision-making capacity is a private attribute, and patients may not necessarily be aware that one of their personal abilities is being explored. Routine exploration of capacity has not historically been a part of psychiatric examination, but it is now difficult to avoid during psychiatric interview.Ethical practice and shared decision-making require patients to be aware that their decision-making may be evaluated by the doctor at some point, and the potential implications of an objective professional conclusion of incapacity. Case law directs that patients should be informed about any assessment of their decision-making ability, though the extent to which this has translated into practice is unclear. However, explanation about the assessment may cause a patient to react negatively, which may impede therapeutic engagement and constitute an ethical dilemma. It is argued that in the absence of systemic measures, professionals should retain the discretion to decide whether a particular patient should be informed about the impending probe into their decision-making ability, or not. In the latter instance, concealment of information about the assessment or its purpose should be subject to the caveats and safeguards associated with any recourse to therapeutic exception. The necessity to mandatorily inform patients about assessment of their capacity introduces a novel ethical dilemma for psychiatrists. The negotiation of this dilemma should not be the prerogative of the clinician, and requires systemic initiatives to ensure universal awareness of patients about the possibility of their capacity being assessed during their journeys through healthcare systems.
机译:患者的决策能力评估在当代医疗保健中普遍存在。本文探讨了精神科医生未公开探讨能力的伦理。讨论将参考英格兰和威尔士的法律,尽管突出的问题可能与类似司法管辖区有关。决策能力是私有属性,患者可能不一定意识到他们的个人能力之一正在探索。常规探索能力历史上没有历史上一直是精神病检查的一部分,但现在难以避免精神科的面试。努力实践和共享决策要求患者意识到他们的决策可以通过医生评估一些人要点,以及客观专业结论干涉的潜在影响。案例法指示患者应了解任何对其决策能力的任何评估,尽管这一切都转化为实践的程度尚不清楚。然而,关于评估的解释可能导致患者对抗性反应,这可能妨碍治疗啮合并构成道德困境。有人认为,在没有系统性措施的情况下,专业人员应保留决定是否应酌情决定是否应将即将探针通知到其决策能力。在后一种情况下,隐瞒有关评估或其目的的信息应受到与治疗例外相关的警告和保障措施。必须向患者提供关于评估其能力的必要性引入了精神科医生的新道德困境。这种困境的谈判不应该是临床医生的特权,并且需要系统性举措,以确保患者普遍意识到通过医疗保健系统在旅途中进行评估的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号