首页> 外文期刊>JAOA: The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association >Characterizing the use of osteopathic manipulative medicine in the obstetric population by trimester and indications for use
【24h】

Characterizing the use of osteopathic manipulative medicine in the obstetric population by trimester and indications for use

机译:特征在妊娠期经产妇中的骨质疗法操纵医学用途及使用适用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) has been shown to successfully alleviate some pregnancy-related pain. However, most of the published data focuses on the third trimester and postpartum period or musculoskeletal indications. To explore OMM use among obstetrical providers and determine the frequency of use by trimester and by clinical indications across multiple types of women’s healthcare practices in Southern and Central Maine. Methods: An anonymous, 43-item survey, presented in English, was emailed to 172 eligible providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives with obstetrics privileges at one of two main delivery centers in southern and central Maine) via an encrypted database system in January 2018. Follow-up email reminders were sent weekly for three weeks. Questions addressed use of OMM for specific indications, knowledge of OMM, and perceived barriers use of OMM. Results: The survey response rate was 73 of 172 (42%); 95% of respondents were physicians (n=69). Due to the low response rate of non-physicians, only data from physicians was included in the study. Data were summarized descriptively as frequencies (n [%]). The highest rates of OMM utilization were during the third trimester (35 [51.5%]) and postpartum (41 [60.3%]) periods, while the lowest rates of utilization were in the intrapartum (eight [11.9%]) and first trimester periods (26 [38.3%]). Osteopathic physicians (n=19) used OMM more frequently in the first, second, and third trimesters, as well as the intrapartum period (10 [52.6%]; 11 [57.9%]; 14 [73.7%]; and six [31.6%], respectively) compared with their allopathic physician (n=50) counterparts (nine [8%]; 15 [30%]; 21 [42%]; and two [4%], respectively). While osteopathic physicians reported higher frequencies of OMM use and referral for non-musculoskeletal indications such as constipation, edema, and nasal congestion (13 [68.4%]; 11 [57.9%]; 10 [52.6%], respectively), musculoskeletal complaints were the most frequently cited indication for OMM use among both osteopathic and allopathic physicians (low back, 67 [97.1%]; pelvis, 65 [94.2%]; coccyx, 50 [72.5%]; and head, 49 [71%]). Conclusion: These results suggest that more education is needed about OMM use in the obstetric population, particularly during early trimesters and the intrapartum period, as well as for visceral and lymphatic complaints of pregnancy.
机译:已经证明骨质疗法操纵医学(OMM)成功缓解了一些与妊娠相关的疼痛。然而,大多数已发表的数据都侧重于第三个三个月和产后期或肌肉骨骼指示。为了探索产科提供者之间的使用,并确定三月的使用频率,并通过南部和中部南部多种妇女医疗保健行为的临床适应症。方法:用加密数据库通过加密数据库通过电子邮件发送给172个符合条件的提供商(医师,护士,并在南部和中央缅因州的两个主要送货中心之一2018年1月系统。随访电子邮件提醒每周发送三周。问题涉及使用OMM进行特定适应症,知识的奥姆,以及感知障碍使用OMM。结果:调查率为73分172名(42%); 95%的受访者是医生(n = 69)。由于非医生的低响应率,只有来自医生的数据被列入该研究。数据如频率(n [%])所汇总。在第三个三个月(35 [51.5%])和产后期间的最高速率(35 [51.5%]),而在南京宁(八[11.9%])和妊娠期最低的利用率(41 [60.3%])。 (26 [38.3%])。骨疗法医生(n = 19)在第一,第二和第三个三个月和三个三个月和三个月期间使用OMM(10 [52.6%]; 11 [57.9%]; 14 [73.7%];和六[31.6 %]分别与其同源医师(n = 50)对应物(九[8%]; 15 [30%]; 21 [42%];和两个[4%])。虽然骨质疗法医生报告了更高的OMM使用频率和对诸如便秘,水肿和鼻塞等非肌肉骨骼指示的频率(13 [68.4%]; 11 [57.9%]; 10 [52.6%]),肌肉骨骼抱怨是骨质疗法和肺病性医生(低回归,67 [97.1%];骨盆,65 [94.2%];尾部,50 [72.5%];和头部,49 [71%])。结论:这些结果表明,需要更多的教育在产科群体中,特别是在早期的Trysters和indactartum期间以及怀孕的内脏和淋巴抱怨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号