...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >Comparative Analgesic Efficacies of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Rectus Sheath Block in Paediatric Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial and Retrospective Cohort Studies
【24h】

Comparative Analgesic Efficacies of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Rectus Sheath Block in Paediatric Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial and Retrospective Cohort Studies

机译:小儿腹部手术术后直肠鞘块罗哌卡因和布比卡因的比较镇痛效果:随机对照试验和回顾性队列研究的荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background. The optimal dose and concentration of analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine (RPV) and bupivacaine (BPV) for postoperative pain relief in paediatric abdominal surgery patients is still unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis compared the efficacy of these analgesics, their administered modes (ultrasound-guided RSB versus LAI) for postoperative pain relief, and side effects. Methods. Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, were exhaustively searched with predefined keywords. Eight randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies were selected. Analgesic effect, postoperative pain score, level of side effect, applied dose, and concentration of drug were analysed. Results. Drug dose ranged from 0.5–2.5?mL/kg of 0.2 to 0.5% concentrations. Male participant for RSB and LAI treatment groups varied from 40–62% and 25–83%, respectively. Mean age of RSB and LAI groups ranged from 3.8–11.65 years and 4.3–11.27 years, respectively. Our meta-analysis revealed that RSB could reduce total opioid use postoperatively (WMD?=??0.02, 95% CI: ?0.02, ?0.02), with I2 value of 15%. We found that the RPV (0.25%, 2.5?ml/kg) was optimal in suppressing the pain. Its lower concentration (0.2%) was ineffective, whereas higher one (0.375%) seems to increase risk of systemic toxicity. Similarly, BPV (0.25%, 2.5?mg/kg) efficaciously reduced the pain score, while its lower concentration was ineffective. The combined postoperative pain score in the RPV-treated group was found to be significantly reduced ( p 0.01 ) with I2 value of 85% indicating high heterogeneity. Conclusion. Both RPV and BPV were significantly effective in reducing postoperative pain score. It appears that RSB could be a preferred choice to deliver analgesia, due to reduced opiate dose requirement and improved clinical safety without significant postoperative adverse events.
机译:背景。 Ropivacaine(RPV)和Bupivacaine(BPV)在儿科腹部手术患者术后疼痛缓解的最佳剂量和镇痛效果仍然尚不清楚。因此,该荟萃分析比较了这些镇痛药的功效,它们的给药模式(超声引导RSB与赖)用于术后疼痛缓解和副作用。方法。系统评论的三个数据库,PubMed,Embase和Cochrane数据库,用预定义的关键字进行了彻底搜索的。选择了八项随机临床试验和回顾性研究。分析了镇痛作用,术后疼痛评分,副作用水平,施用剂量和药物浓度。结果。药物剂量范围为0.5-2.5?ml / kg 0.2至0.5%浓度。 RSB和LAI治疗组的男性参与者分别从40-62%和25-83%变化。 RSB和Lai群体的平均年龄分别为3.8-11.65岁和4.3-11.27岁。我们的荟萃分析显示RSB可以减少术后(WMD?= 0.02,95%CI:0.02,Δ02),I2值为15%的I2值。我们发现RPV(0.25%,2.5?ml / kg)在抑制疼痛时是最佳的。其较低浓度(0.2%)无效,而较高(0.375%)似乎增加了系统性毒性的风险。同样,BPV(0.25%,2.5×mg / kg)有效地降低了疼痛评分,而其较低浓度无效。发现RPV处理组的术后疼痛评分被发现显着降低(p 0.01),I2值为85%,表明高异质性。结论。 RPV和BPV均显着有效地减少术后疼痛评分。由于表现减少的术后不良事件,RSB似乎是递送镇痛的首选,而不是显着的术后不良事件的临床安全性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号