...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology >Biological Evaluation of Acellular Cartilaginous and Dermal Matrixes as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Cartilage Regeneration
【24h】

Biological Evaluation of Acellular Cartilaginous and Dermal Matrixes as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Cartilage Regeneration

机译:无细胞软骨和皮肤基质作为软骨再生组织工程支架的生物学评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An acellular matrix (AM) as a kind of natural biomaterial is gaining increasing attention in tissue engineering applications. An acellular cartilaginous matrix (ACM) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) are two kinds of the most widely used AMs in cartilage tissue engineering. However, there is still debate over which of these AMs achieves optimal cartilage regeneration, especially in immunocompetent large animals. In the current study, we fabricated porous ADM and ACM scaffolds by a freeze-drying method and confirmed that ADM had a larger pore size than ACM. By recolonization with goat chondrocytes and in vitro culture, ADM scaffolds exhibited a higher cell adhesion rate, more homogeneous chondrocyte distribution, and neocartilage formation compared with ACM. Additionally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) indicated that expression of cartilage-related genes, including ACAN, COLIIA1, and SOX9, was significant higher in the ADM group than the ACM group. Furthermore, after subcutaneous implantation in a goat, histological evaluation showed that ADM achieved more stable and matured cartilage compared with ACM, which was confirmed by quantitative data including the wet weight, volume, and contents of DNA, GAG, total collagen, and collagen II. Additionally, immunological assessment suggested that ADM evoked a low immune response compared with ACM as evidenced by qPCR and immunohistochemical analyses of CD3 and CD68, and TUNEL. Collectively, our results indicate that ADM is a more suitable AM for cartilage regeneration, which can be used for cartilage regeneration in immunocompetent large animals.
机译:一种无细胞基质(AM)作为一种天然生物材料正在增加组织工程应用中的注意力。无细胞软骨基质(ACM)和无细胞性皮肤基质(ADM)是软骨组织工程中最广泛使用的AMS两种。然而,仍然存在这些AMS中的哪一个达到最佳的软骨再生,特别是在免疫活性大型动物中。在目前的研究中,我们通过冷冻干燥方法制造多孔ADM和ACM支架,并确认ADM具有比ACM更大的孔径。通过用山羊软骨细胞和体外培养的重组,ADM支架表现出更高的细胞粘附速率,更均匀的软骨细胞分布和与ACM相比的新核形成。另外,定量聚合酶链反应(QPCR)表明,在AMM组中,在ADM组中,包含Acan,Coliia1和Sox9的软骨相关基因的表达显着高于ACM组。此外,在山羊皮下植入后,组织学评估显示,与ACM相比,ADM达到了更稳定和成熟的软骨,其通过定量数据证实,包括DNA,GAG,总胶原蛋白和胶原II的湿重量,体积和含量和胶原II 。此外,免疫学评估表明,与ACM相比,ADM引起了低免疫应答,如CD3和CD68和TUNEL的QPCR和免疫组化分析所证明。统称,我们的结果表明ADM是软骨再生的更适合,可用于免疫活性大型动物的软骨再生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号