...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Efficacy of ribavirin and interferon-α therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Efficacy of ribavirin and interferon-α therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study

机译:利巴韦林和干扰素-α治疗住院治疗患者的疗效 - 19:多中心,回顾性队列研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin and interferon-α (RBV/IFN-α) therapy in COVID-19 patients. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to 4 hospitals in Hubei Province, China, from 31 December 2019 to 31 March 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their exposure to RBV/IFN-α therapy within 48 h of admission. Mixed-effect Cox model and Logistic regression were used to explore the association between early treatments of RBV/IFN-α and primary outcomes. Results Of 2037 patients included, 1281 received RBV/IFN-α (RBV, IFN-α or RBV combined with IFN-α) treatments and 756 received none of these treatments. In a mixed effect model, RBV/IFN-α therapy was not associated with progression from non-severe into severe type (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.88?1.36) or with reduction in 30-day mortality (aHR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.61?1.30). However, it was associated with a higher probability of hospital stay 15 days (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.68?2.64) compared with no RBV/IFN-α therapy. The propensity score-matched cohort and subgroup analysis displayed similar results. Conclusion RBV/IFN-α therapy was not observed to improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients suggesting that RBV/IFN-α therapy should be avoided in COVID-19 treatment.
机译:目的评估利巴韦林和干扰素-α(RBV / IFN-α)治疗在Covid-19患者中的疗效和安全性。方法采用2019年12月31日至2020年3月31日,湖北省院长录入4家医院的Covid-19患者的多中心,回顾性队列研究。根据他们在48内接触RBV / IFN-α治疗患者将患者分为2组H入场。混合效应Cox模型和逻辑回归用于探讨RBV / IFN-α和主要结果的早期治疗之间的关联。结果包括2037名患者,1281名接受RBV / IFN-α(RBV,IFN-α或RBV与IFN-α)治疗和756个没有这些治疗方法。在混合效果模型中,RBV / IFN-α治疗与从非严重成严重类型的进展无关(调整后危险比(AHR)= 1.09,95%CI:0.88?1.36)或减少30天死亡率(AHR = 0.89,95%CI:0.61?1.30)。然而,它与较高的医院住宿概率相关联; 15天(调整后的差距(AOR)= 2.11,95%CI:1.68?2.64)与NO RBV / IFN-α治疗相比。倾向分数匹配的队列和子组分析显示了类似的结果。结论未观察到RBV / IFN-α治疗,以改善Covid-19患者的临床结果,旨在在Covid-19治疗中避免RBV / IFN-α治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号