...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Effectiveness and process evaluation in obesity and type 2 diabetes prevention programs in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness and process evaluation in obesity and type 2 diabetes prevention programs in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:儿童肥胖症和2型糖尿病预防方案的有效性和过程评估:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Obesity in children is one of the most severe public health challenges of the current century and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) frequency is also escalating. More so, the importance of process evaluation (PE) in complex interventions is increasingly recognized. The present review, aims to identify the effectiveness in terms of body composition parameters in a generation of articles to prevent obesity and T2DM in children. We hypothesise that those studies reporting PE applying the latest implementation guidelines suggested by the researchers would potentially show positive changes in body composition compared to those not reporting it. Additionally, we will evaluate the implementation degree of PE in those articles considering it and describe the PE subcomponents. Lastly, we aim to assess the intervention target used and its results. A literature review was performed in parallel by 2 independent reviewers. A final number of 41 studies were selected for inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of BMI and zBMI found non-significant effects of the proposed interventions. Sub-group analysis revealed only a significant effect in studies which performed PE. Moreover, PE was reported in 42% effective studies and 57% non-effective studies. Fidelity and satisfaction were the most implemented PE subcomponents, although there was a generally low grade of PE use (7/41). The highest proportion of effectiveness (83%) was shown in interventions of physical activity alone while the intervention most used was 3-arm target (diet, PA and BS). Overall, obesity and T2DM prevention studies included in this review are not effective in terms of BMI and zBMI. Those studies performing PE reported to be effective in terms of BMI, while studies not reporting PE did not have positive results in terms of BMI and zBMI. In addition, none of the intervention studies included all PE indicators and most studies, which included PE in their interventions, did not provide full report of the PE components, according to the guidelines used for the present review. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018093667.
机译:儿童肥胖是本世纪最严重的公共卫生挑战之一,2型糖尿病(T2DM)频率也在升级。此外,越来越多地认识到过程评估(PE)在复杂干预中的重要性。本综述,旨在在一代制品中识别身体成分参数方面的有效性,以防止儿童肥胖和T2DM。我们假设关于研究人员建议的最新实施指南的人报告PE的研究将潜在地显示与未经报告的人的积极变化。此外,我们将评估考虑其并描述PE子组件的这些文章中PE的实施程度。最后,我们的目标是评估所使用的干预目标及其结果。由2个独立审阅者并行进行文献综述。选择最终的41项研究进行纳入标准。 BMI和ZBMI的荟萃分析发现了所提出的干预措施的非显着影响。亚组分析仅揭示了进行PE的研究中的显着效果。此外,PE在42%的有效研究中举报和57%的非有效研究。富达和满意度是最具实施的PE子组件,尽管普遍低等级的PE使用(7/41)。有效性比例最高(83%)显示在单独的身体活动的干预措施,而使用最多的介入是3臂靶(饮食,PA和BS)。整体而言,本综述中包含的肥胖和T2DM预防研究在BMI和ZBMI方面无效。执行PE的研究报告据报道,在BMI方面是有效的,而没有报告PE的研究没有对BMI和ZBMI的结果没有积极的结果。此外,没有任何干预研究包括所有PE指标和大多数研究,其中包括PE的干预措施,根据本审查的指导方针没有提供PE组件的完整报告。 Prospero注册号:CRD42018093667。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号