首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) in Adults with Type?1 Diabetes: The PRONTO-T1D Extension
【24h】

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) in Adults with Type?1 Diabetes: The PRONTO-T1D Extension

机译:具有型型糖尿病型成人的超快速LISPRO(URLI)的长期疗效和安全性:PRONTO-T1D延伸

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionThe PRONTO-T1D study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro in adults with type?1 diabetes (T1D), met the primary endpoint of noninferiority of HbA1c change from baseline compared to lispro at 26?weeks. We present results of an additional 26-week treatment phase evaluating long-term efficacy and safety of URLi.MethodsIn this phase?3, treat-to-target study, subjects were randomized to double-blind mealtime URLi, lispro, or open-label postmeal URLi with insulin degludec or glargine for 26?weeks. Subjects in the double-blind URLi ( n =?451) and lispro ( n =?442) groups continued for another 26?weeks to assess long-term efficacy and safety.ResultsHbA1c increased marginally during the long-term maintenance period (week?26–52) in both groups to 7.47% (URLi) and 7.54% (lispro). At week?52, there were no statistically significant treatment differences in change from baseline HbA1c with a least-squares mean treatment difference (95% confidence interval) of ? 0.06% (? 0.16, 0.03). Proportions of patients with HbA 1c ??7% at week?52 were similar (URLi, 26.8%; lispro, 24.5%). Self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) showed that 1-h (9.23 versus 10.14?mmol/L) and 2-h (8.40 versus 9.53?mmol/L) postmeal daily mean glucose was statistically significantly ( p ?0.001) lower with URLi than lispro. The rate and incidence of severe, documented, and postprandial hypoglycemia (?54?mg/dl [3.0?mmol/L]) were similar between treatments, but URLi demonstrated a 31% lower rate in the period more than 4?h after meals, ( p =?0.023). Injection site reactions were reported by 3.3% of patients on URLi and 0.9% on lispro. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatments.ConclusionOverall glycemic control and improved postprandial glucose via SMBG were maintained after 52?weeks with URLi versus lispro, suggesting that the efficacy of URLi is preserved during long-term treatment in patients with T1D. No long-term safety issues were identified with URLi.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214367.
机译:介绍Pronto-T1D研究,评估了超快速LISPRO(URLI)的疗效和安全性与型患者(T1D)的成虫(T1D),符合来自基线的HBA1c变化的主要终点,与LISPRO相比26?周。我们呈现另外26周的治疗阶段的结果评估urli的长期疗效和安全性。方法吗?3,治疗目标研究,受试者被随机化为双盲膳食Urli,Lispro或开放标签用胰岛素Degludec或Glargine的蛋白酶urli 26?周。双盲URLI(n = 451)和LISPRO(n =Δ442)组的主题持续另外26个?几周以评估长期疗效和安全性。在长期维持期间(一周)在长期维持期间略微增加(一周? 26-52)在两组中至7.47%(URLI)和7.54%(LISPRO)。在一周?52中,从基线HBA1c发生统计学上显着的治疗差异,最小二乘法平均治疗差异(95%置信区间)? 0.06%(?0.16,0.03)。 HBA 1C的患者的比例在一周内ααα,α<7%(URLI,26.8%; LISPRO,24.5%)。自我监测的血糖(SMBG)显示1-H(9.23与10.14mmol / L)和2-H(8.40与9.53摩尔/克)的后膜每日平均葡萄糖在统计学上显着显着(P <0.001)与URLI比LISPRO。治疗之间具有严重,记录和后催化剂的速率和发病率(&αmg/ dl [3.0-mmol / l]),但URLi在超过4Ωh的时间内显示出31%的较低速率饭后(p = 0.023)。将注射部位反应报告3.3%的Urli患者,均为leispro 0.9%。治疗的发生率类似于治疗。在52次与LISPRO与URLI与URLI与LISPRO相比,将通过SMBG进行血糖血糖对照和通过SMBG的改进的后葡萄糖。表明T1D患者的长期治疗期间保留了URLI的疗效。 。 NCT03214367的URLI.TRIAL MANICATIONCLINICALTIALS.GOV,NCT03214367没有鉴定长期安全问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号