首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources for Health >Outcomes, mechanisms and contextual factors of positive psychology interventions for health workers: a systematic review of global evidence
【24h】

Outcomes, mechanisms and contextual factors of positive psychology interventions for health workers: a systematic review of global evidence

机译:卫生工作者积极心理学干预的结果,机制和背景因素:对全球证据的系统审查

获取原文
       

摘要

Interventions using positive psychology (PP), which build on positive qualities of healthcare personnel and institutions, could potentially enhance organisational performance in healthcare. The aim of this systematic review was to identify if PP interventions have an impact on organisational performance of healthcare personnel, and if so, how this impact can be achieved. We developed a logic model to explain the impact of PP interventions on organisational performance. We searched Web of Science, Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL (from inception until March 2019) and references of included articles to identify studies that evaluated the impact of a PP intervention for health personnel. Study quality was assessed using the SQUIRE checklist for quality improvement studies. Data were extracted about study details, setting, participants, intervention, method of evaluation and results. Outcomes, mechanisms and contexts were coded in nVivo. Data synthesis was guided by Lewis’ theory of the impact of PP interventions on organisational performance and Kneale et al.’s method for logic model development. Collected data were integrated into a logic model explaining initial inputs, processes, and intermediate outcomes of PP interventions that lead to improved organisational performance in healthcare settings. We retrieved 4638 articles and identified five through references of included articles of which 29 studies (31 articles) met our inclusion criteria. Most articles were of low quality (n?=?19) and outcome measures varied widely. We identified 54 different outcomes of PP interventions, including ‘improved well-being’ and ‘improved interaction and support’. Forty-nine mechanisms were identified including ‘recognising and reframing negative interpretations’. Twenty four contextual factors were identified of which seven acted as barriers. ‘Managerial support’ was a facilitator mentioned in eight studies. All identified outcomes, mechanisms and contextual factors were integrated into a logic model explaining how interventions using PP can impact organisational performance in healthcare. Few identified outcomes were statistically significant, however, trends in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes show that PP interventions can increase well-being and interaction and support and thus improve organisational performance in healthcare. The developed logic model can be used in the implementation and evaluation of interventions using PP for health personnel.
机译:使用积极心理学(PP)的干预措施,建立在医疗保健人员和机构的积极品质上,可能会提高医疗保健的组织绩效。这种系统审查的目的是确定PP干预是否对医疗人员的组织绩效产生影响,如果是,可以实现这种影响。我们开发了一个逻辑模型来解释PP干预对组织绩效的影响。我们搜索了科学,Medline,Psychinfo,Embase,Scopus和Cinahl网站(从成立到2019年3月)以及包含的文章的参考文章,以确定评估PP干预对卫生人员的影响的研究。使用Squire清单评估研究质量进行质量改进研究。提取数据关于研究细节,设定,参与者,干预,评估方法和结果。结果,机制和上下文在NVIVO中编码。数据综合是由Lewis对PP干预对组织性能和Kneale等人的影响的影响。逻辑模型开发的方法。收集的数据被集成到解释PP干预措施的初始输入,过程和中间结果的逻辑模型中,这导致了在医疗保健环境中提高了组织性能。我们检索了4638篇文章,并通过其中包括其中29项研究(31篇文章)达到了我们的纳入标准的文章的参考文章确定了五个。大多数物品的质量低(n?=?19),结果措施很大。我们确定了54个不同的PP干预结果,包括“改善福祉”和“改善的互动和支持”。确定了四十九项机制,包括“认识和恢复负面解释”。确定了二十四个语境因素,其中七个担任障碍。 “管理支持”是八项研究中提到的一个促进者。所有已识别的结果,机制和上下文因素都集成到逻辑模型中,说明使用PP的干预措施如何影响医疗保健中的组织绩效。然而,很少有鉴定的结果是统计学意义,然而,定量和定性结果的趋势表明,PP干预措施可以增加福祉和互动和支持,从而提高医疗保健方面的组织表现。开发的逻辑模型可用于使用PP进行卫生人员的干预措施的实施和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号