...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in urology. >Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal disease: which is the preferred approach?

机译:对炎症性肾病的腹腔镜和手工辅助腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:这是首选方法?

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: Management of inflammatory renal disease (IRD) can still be technically challenging for laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with IRD. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 107 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) for IRD from January 2008 to March 2020, including pyonephrosis, renal tuberculosis, hydronephrosis, and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative recovery and complications were compared between the LN and HALN groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Results: Fifty-five subjects in the LN group and 52 subjects in the HALN group were enrolled in this study. In the LN group, laparoscopic nephrectomy was successfully performed in 50 patients (90.9%), while four (7.3%) patients were converted to HALN and one (1.8%) case was converted to open procedure. In HALN group, operations were completed in 51 (98.1%) patients and conversion to open surgery was necessary in one patient (1.9%). The LN group had a shorter median incision length (5?cm versus 7?cm, p??0.01) but a longer median operative duration (140?min versus 105?min, p??0.01) than the HALN group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, intraoperative complication rate, postoperative complication rate, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that severe perinephric adhesions was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Both LN and HALN appear to be safe and feasible for IRD. As a still minimally invasive approach, HALN provided an alternative to IRD or when conversion was needed in LN.
机译:目的:炎症性肾病(IRD)的管理仍然可以在技术上挑战腹腔镜手术。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜和手动辅助腹腔镜肾切除术的安全性和可行性IRD患者。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2008年1月至2020年3月至3月6月的腹腔镜肾切除术(LN)和手工辅助腹腔镜肾切除术(HALN)的107例患者的数据,包括肾病,肾结核病,肾值眼和黄色生殖肾盂肾炎。在LN和HALN组之间比较患者人口统计学,操作结果和术后回收和并发症。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定不利结果的独立预测因子。结果:本研究报告了LN组中的五十五个受试者和哈恩组的52名受试者。在LN组中,腹腔镜肾切除术在50名患者中成功进行(90.9%),而四个(7.3%)患者转化为HALN,一(1.8%)案例转化为开放程序。在HALN组中,运营于51例(98.1%)患者完成,并在一名患者(1.9%)中必需转化为开放手术。 LN组的中值切口长度较短(5Ωcm,7厘米,p≤0.01),但较长的中值操作持续时间(140Ω分钟,p≤x≤0.01)比暂停团体。失血,术中并发症率,术后并发症率没有显着差异,肠功能恢复和两组之间的住院。多变量的逻辑回归揭示了严重的阴部粘连是不良结果的独立预测因子。结论:LN和HALN均似乎是安全可靠的IRD。作为仍然存在的侵入性方法,HALN提供了IRD的替代或在LN中需要转换时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号