首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [ 18 F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
【24h】

Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [ 18 F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study

机译:使用定量动态[18 f] FDG PET和CT灌注,预测肺癌立体定向烧蚀治疗(SABR)后的病理完全反应(SABR):探讨临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is effective in treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. This prospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for true pathologic complete response (pCR) to SABR using imaging-based biomarkers from dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion (CTP). Twenty-six patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR followed by surgical resection were included, as a pre-specified secondary analysis of a larger study. Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CTP were performed pre-SABR and 8-week post. Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET provided maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and kinetic parameters estimated using a previously developed flow-modified two-tissue compartment model while CTP measured blood flow, blood volume and vessel permeability surface product. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to establish a predictive model with the measured PET and CTP imaging biomarkers for predicting pCR. The model was compared to current RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1) and PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0) criteria. RPA identified three response groups based on tumour blood volume before SABR (BVpre-SABR) and change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax), the thresholds being BVpre-SABR?=?9.3?mL/100?g and ΔSUVmax?=???48.9%. The highest true pCR rate of 92% was observed in the group with BVpre-SABR??9.3?mL/100?g and ΔSUVmax????48.9% after SABR while the worst was observed in the group with BVpre-SABR?≥?9.3?mL/100?g (0%). RPA model achieved excellent pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.92; P?=?0.03). RECIST and PERCIST showed poor pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.54 and 0.58, respectively). In this study, we developed a predictive model based on dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion imaging that was significantly better than RECIST and PERCIST criteria to predict pCR of NSCLC to SABR. The model used BVpre-SABR and ΔSUVmax which correlates to tumour microvessel density and cell proliferation, respectively and warrants validation with larger sample size studies.
机译:立体定向烧蚀疗法(SABR)在治疗I阶段(NSCLC)的治疗中有效,但在SABR难以后对响应的成像评估。这种前瞻性研究旨在使用来自动态[18F] FDG-PET和CT灌注(CTP)的成像的生物标志物,对真实病理完全反应(PCR)进行真实病理完全反应(PCR)的预测模型。用SABR治疗的二十六名患有早期NSCLC,随后进行手术切除,作为对更大的研究的预先确定的二次分析。动态[18F] FDG-PET和CTP进行SABR前和8周的柱。动态[18F] FDG-PET提供了使用先前显影的流动改性的两组织隔室模型估计的最大和平均标准化摄取值(SUV)和动力学参数,而CTP测量血流,血容量和血管渗透性表面产品。递归分配分析(RPA)用于建立具有测量PET和CTP成像生物标志物的预测模型,用于预测PCR。将该模型与当前再次入侵(实体瘤1.1版本1.1中的响应评估标准)进行比较,并且Percist(实体肿瘤版本1.0的宠物响应标准)标准。 RPA在SABR(BVPRE-SABR)之前鉴定了三个响应基团,并在SABR(BVPRE-SABR)和SUVMAX(ΔSuvmax)的变化中,阈值是BVPRE-SABR?=α.9.3?ML / 100?G和ΔSuvmax?= ??? 48.9% 。在具有BVPRE-SABR的基团中观察到最高的真实PCR速率为92%,αα,Δ1.9.3×100μl/ 100·Δ≤1.Δsuvmax,在SABR后48.9%,而在与BVPRE的组中观察到最差的情况-Sabr?≥≤9.3?ml / 100?g(0%)。 RPA模型实现了优异的PCR预测(一致:0.92; P?= 0.03)。再循环和Percist显示出差的PCR预测(共和:0.54和0.58分别)。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种基于动态[18F] FDG-PET和CT灌注成像的预测模型,所述CT灌注成像明显优于RECIST和Percist标准,以预测NSCLC的PCR至SABR。使用与肿瘤微血管密度和细胞增殖相关的BVPRE-SABR和ΔSuvmax的模型分别与较大样本量的研究进行验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号