首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
【24h】

Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers

机译:放射治疗结构深度学习的自动分割的实施:两种癌症中心的工作流程研究

获取原文
           

摘要

We recently described the validation of deep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models for organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes (CTV). In this study, we evaluate the performance of implemented DC models in the clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning workflow and report on user experience. DC models were implemented at two cancer centers and used to generate OAR and CTVs for all patients undergoing RT for a central nervous system (CNS), head and neck (H&N), or prostate cancer. Radiation Therapists/Dosimetrists and Radiation Oncologists completed post-contouring surveys rating the degree of edits required for DCs (1?=?minimal, 5?=?significant) and overall DC satisfaction (1?=?poor, 5?=?high). Unedited DCs were compared to the edited treatment approved contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). Between September 19, 2019 and March 6, 2020, DCs were generated on approximately 551 eligible cases. 203 surveys were collected on 27 CNS, 54 H&N, and 93 prostate RT plans, resulting in an overall survey compliance rate of 32%. The majority of OAR DCs required minimal edits subjectively (mean editing score?≤?2) and objectively (mean DSC and 95% HD was?≥?0.90 and?≤?2.0?mm). Mean OAR satisfaction score was 4.1 for CNS, 4.4 for H&N, and 4.6 for prostate structures. Overall CTV satisfaction score (n?=?25), which encompassed the prostate, seminal vesicles, and neck lymph node volumes, was 4.1. Previously validated OAR DC models for CNS, H&N, and prostate RT planning required minimal subjective and objective edits and resulted in a positive user experience, although low survey compliance was a concern. CTV DC model evaluation was even more limited, but high user satisfaction suggests that they may have served as appropriate starting points for patient specific edits.
机译:我们最近描述了在风险(OAR)和临床目标体积(CTV)的机器官的基于深度学习的自动分段轮廓(DC)模型的验证。在这项研究中,我们评估了在临床放疗(RT)规划工作流程中实施的DC模型的性能和关于用户体验的报告。 DC模型在两种癌症中心实施,用于为中枢神经系统(CNS),头部和颈部(H&N)或前列腺癌进行RT的所有患者产生OAR和CTV。辐射治疗师/微量分子和辐射肿瘤学家完成了轮廓后调查评级DCS所需的编辑程度(1?=?最小,5?=?重要)和总体DC满意度(1?=?差,5?=?高) 。将未经编辑的DCS与使用骰子相似系数(DSC)和95%Hausdorff距离(HD)进行编辑治疗批准的轮廓。在2019年9月19日至3月6日之间,在大约551个符合条件的情况下产生了DCS。 203年调查收集在27个CNS,54 H&N和93个前列腺RT计划中,导致总体调查合规率为32%。大多数OAR DCS是主观的(平均编辑得分?≤α2)和客观地(平均DSC和95%HD的大多数oar dcs都是最小的编辑(平均dsc和95%hd?≥≤0.90和?≤≤2.0?mm)。 CNS,4.4的平均OAR满意度得分为4.1,适用于H&N,4.6,前列腺结构4.6。整体CTV满意度评分(n?=Δ25),包括前列腺,精髓囊泡和颈淋巴结体积为4.1。以前验证了CNS,H&N和前列腺RT规划的OAR DC模型需要最小的主观和客观的编辑,并导致了积极的用户体验,尽管低调查合规是一个问题。 CTV DC模型评估更有限,但高用户满意度表明它们可能是患者特定编辑的适当起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号