首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >A comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for children with asthma
【24h】

A comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for children with asthma

机译:哮喘儿童互补和替代疗法的疗效和安全性比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:Bronchial Asthma is a chronic, hyperreactive inflammation of the airway that involves a variety of inflammatory cells. Due to the persistence of airway hyperresponsiveness, lung function is progressively damaged, making asthma more stubborn and difficult to heal. In recent years, the prevalence of childhood asthma is still on an increasing trend. Repeated asthma attacks not only affect children's life and learning, but also bring greater economic and mental burden to children's families, and even threaten children's lives. Traditional treatment methods such as oral western medicine, atomization therapy has obvious limitations, and the complementary and alternative therapy is an effective method to treat asthma in children. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of various complementary and alternative therapies for children with asthma by means of mesh meta-analysis. In order to provide the basis for clinical rational use.METHODS:Use the computer to search the self-built database until January 2021, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Cochrance Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, Clinical Trials and other electronic databases to collect RCT studies on complementary and alternative therapies for for children with asthma. We will screen the relevant literature included in the systematic review/meta analysis. At the same time, Revman 5.3 software will be used for meta-analysis, and grade will be used to grade the quality of evidence in the network meta-analysis.RESULTS:This study will compare the efficacy and safety of different complementary and alternative therapies to treat childhood asthma, and evaluate and rank different interventions.CONCLUSION:The combined use of complementary and alternative therapies for childhood asthma on the basis of conventional basic treatment can improve clinical efficacy, reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, improve the quality of life of children, and provide strong support for the rational use of clinicians.INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER:INPLASY202120005.Copyright ? 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
机译:背景:支气管哮喘是慢性,过度反应性的气道炎症,涉及各种炎症细胞。由于气道高反应性的持续性,肺功能逐渐受损,使哮喘更顽固,难以愈合。近年来,儿童哮喘的患病率仍在呈增加趋势。反复哮喘袭击不仅影响儿童的生活和学习,而且还为儿童家属带来更大的经济和精神负担,甚至威胁到儿童的生命。口服西医等传统治疗方法,雾化治疗具有明显的局限性,互补和替代疗法是治疗儿童哮喘的有效方法。本研究将通过网格荟萃分析评估各种互补和替代疗法的疗效和安全性的疗效和安全性。为了提供临床合理使用的基础。方法:使用计算机搜索自建数据库,直到2011年1月2021日,中国国家知识基础设施,万芳数据库,中国科学期刊数据库,中国生物医学文献数据库,PubMed,Chchrance图书馆,Embase,科学,临床试验和其他电子数据库,收集RCT关于哮喘儿童互补和替代疗法的RCT研究。我们将筛选系统审查/元分析中包含的相关文献。与此同时,Revman 5.3软件将用于元分析,等级将用于级联网络元分析中的证据质量。结果:本研究将比较不同互补和替代疗法的疗效和安全性为了治疗儿童哮喘,评估和排名不同的干预。结论:结合在常规基础治疗的基础上的儿童哮喘互补和替代疗法的结合使用可以提高临床疗效,减少不良反应的发生,提高生活质量儿童,并为合理使用的临床医生提供强有力的支持。inplasy注册号:Inplasy202120005.Copyright? 2021提交人。由Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号