首页> 外文期刊>Indian heart journal >Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention
【24h】

Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入后止血装置径向与股骨通路的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Arterial access site complications are the important predictor of successful percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We prospectively studied 722 consecutive PCI patients for access site complications. A total of 303 trans-femoral access (TFA) patients who had suture based vascular closure devices (VCD) were compared with 419 transradial access (TRA) patients. Incidence of hematoma was more in TFA (2.3% vs 0.23%, p 0.01). Median ambulation time (4?h vs 1?h, p ?0.01) was significantly higher in TFA. In conclusion, TRA had fewer access site complications like haematoma, compared to TFA with VCD. TRA also resulted in earlier ambulation and discharge, compared to TFA with VCD.
机译:动脉接入站点并发症是成功经皮冠状动脉干预(PCI)的重要预测因子。 我们预期研究了722名连续的PCI患者进行接入站点并发症。 将患有基于缝合线的血管闭合装置(VCD)的患者共有303名跨性股票(TFA)患者与419名跨越术语(TRA)患者进行比较。 TFA的血肿发生率更多(2.3%vs 0.23%,p 0.01)。 在TFA中,中位的示波器时间(4?H Vs 1?H,P& 0.01)显着高。 总之,与血肿相比,TRA与VCD的TFA相比,血肿等血肿等随访部位并发症较少。 与VCD的TFA相比,TRA也导致了早期的救护和放电。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号