首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cardiologica >Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention
【24h】

Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention

机译:径向通道与股骨进入的比较使用血管闭合装置,用于预防血管并发症和经皮冠状动脉介入后的死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Radial access (RA) and vascular closure devices (VCD) have been shown to be superior to transfemoral access (TFA) with regard to the prevention of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
机译:背景:径向接入(RA)和血管闭合装置(VCD)在经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)后,预防血管并发症方面的血管接入(TFA)优异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号