...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study
【24h】

Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes: a case-control study

机译:妊娠期妊娠期妊娠期妊娠期妊娠期妊娠期结果的影响:案例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In 2010, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) proposed new criteria indicating that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can be diagnosed if the fasting threshold of ≤92?mg/dL, 1-h threshold of ≤180?mg/dL, or 2-h threshold of ≤153?mg/dL are exceeded during the 75-g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed at 24–28?weeks of gestation. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends using the proposed diagnostic threshold values of the IADPSG to diagnose GDM; however, it does not limit the timing of the 75-g OGTT. Since 2010 in Japan, GDM has been diagnosed using the same criteria as that proposed by the WHO. However, neither the JSOG nor the WHO has provided any evidence that it is appropriate to use a threshold beyond the range recommended by the IADPSG. This was a single-centre retrospective study based on the medical records and delivery registry database of our centre. We included women who underwent a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) with results ?140?mg/dL at 24–28?weeks of gestation and subsequently underwent a 75-g OGTT after 29?weeks of gestation with abnormal glucose tolerance suspected based on clinical findings. The reference values for the 75-g OGTT followed the IADPSG criteria. Subjects were classified into the normal glucose tolerance (NGT) group and the GDM group. The type of delivery and neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed to match the backgrounds of both groups. In total, the NGT and GDM group comprised 189 and 49 women, respectively. Emergency caesarean delivery rates were similar in the GDM and NGT groups (10.6 and 12.2%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–3.64; p?=?0.74); however, the elective caesarean delivery rate was higher in the GDM group than in the NGT group (16.3 and 5.3%, respectively, adjusted OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.27–10.19; p?=?0.01). No significant differences were observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes between both groups. Although a diagnosis of GDM during the third trimester does not improve pregnancy outcomes, it increases the elective caesarean delivery rate.
机译:2010年,国际糖尿病和怀孕研究组(IADPSG)的协会提出了表明,如果≤92μm≤92μm≤18Ωmg,1-h阈值,则可以诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的新标准在75-g 2-H口服葡萄糖耐受试验(OGTT)期间,超过24-28次妊娠期进行的75g 2-H 2-Hαmg/ dl的/ dl或≤153Ω·mg / dl的2-h阈值。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议使用IADPSG的拟议诊断阈值诊断GDM;但是,它不会限制75g ogtt的时间。自2010年以来,在日本,GDM已被诊断使用与世卫组织提出的相同标准。然而,Jsog和世卫组织都没有提供任何证据表明它适合使用超出IADPSG推荐的范围的阈值。这是基于我们中心的医疗记录和交付注册表数据库的单中心回顾性研究。我们包括患有50g葡萄糖攻击试验(GCT)的女性,其结果为24-28〜240〜240个周,随后在29〜29个妊娠期葡萄糖后进行75克ogtt。耐受性涉及临床发现。 75-G OGTT的参考值跟随IADPSG标准。将受试者分为正常葡萄糖耐受性(NGT)组和GDM组。比较了两组的递送和新生儿结果。进行多变量分析以匹配两组的背景。总共,NGT和GDM组分别组成了189和49名妇女。 GDM和NGT基团的紧急剖反分率相似(分别为10.6和12.2%;调整后的差距[或],1.25; 95%置信区间[CI],0.43-3.64; p?= 0.74);然而,GDM组的选修剖便率高于NGT组(分别为16.3和5.3%,调整或3.60; 95%CI,1.27-10.19; P?= 0.01)。在两个组之间的其他孕产妇和新生儿结果中没有观察到显着差异。虽然在第三个三个月期间GDM的诊断不会改善妊娠结果,但它增加了选修剖面速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号