首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws
【24h】

Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

机译:Metacarpal轴固定:背部电镀,滞后螺钉和无头压缩螺钉的生物力学比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Metacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct. Five matched paired hands (age 60.9?±?4.6?years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n?=?7) and plating (n?=?8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n?=?8) were compared with plating (n?=?8) and lag screws (n?=?7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated. For transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4?N/mm and 584.8?N, than plates, means 129.02?N/mm and 303.9?N (both p??0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209?N/mm and 758.4?N, for plates?258.7?N/mm and 518.5?N, and for lag screws 172.18?N/mm and 234.11?N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p?=?0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p??0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p?=?0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups. Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work. Basic Science Study, Biomechanics.
机译:蜂窝杆骨折是常见的,可以是无可处的处理的。缩短,角度和旋转畸形是外科治疗的适应症。已经记录了各种形式的具有优缺点的治疗。该研究的目的是确定骨折固定的稳定性与髓内无缝压缩螺钉中的两种类型的髓臂骨折,并将它们与其他常见形式的刚性固定形式进行比较:背部电镀和滞后螺钉固定。假设无头压缩螺钉将展示生物力学更强的构建体。利用非拇指髓样,使用五个匹配的配对手(60.9岁?±4.6岁)用于两种骨折类型的比较固定。在横向透析性裂缝中,比较了无头压缩螺钉的固定(n?=Δ7)并进行电镀(n?=Δ8)。在长期倾斜的透气性裂缝中,将无头压缩螺钉(n?=Δ8)与电镀(n≤x≤8)和滞后螺钉进行比较(n?=Δ7)。使用产生顶点背部的MTS帧,三点弯曲力进行测试。从产生的负载 - 位移曲线计算出故障和刚度的峰值负荷。对于横向骨折,无头压缩螺钉具有明显更高的刚度和峰值负荷,意指249.4?n / mm和584.8?n,意指129.02?n / mm和303.9?n(p≤x≤0.001 )。对于长倾斜骨折,刚度和峰值负荷对无头压缩螺钉的失效均为209Ω·n / mm和758.4?n,适用于平板?258.7?n / mm和518.5?n,以及滞后螺钉172.18?n / mm 234.11?ñ。对于无头压缩螺钉的峰值负荷有显着性,对于无头压缩螺钉VS板(P?= 0.023),无头压缩螺钉与滞后螺钉(P?& 0.001),以及板Vs滞后螺钉(p?= 0.009)。组之间的刚度没有显着差异。具有无头压缩螺钉的透气性型骨折骨折的髓内壳体提供优异的生物力学稳定性。与不利影响的较低风险相结合,无头压缩螺钉可能是需要快速返回运动或工作的那些选择的优选选择。基础科学研究,生物力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号