首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities in a psychiatry core clerkship: an observational study
【24h】

Workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities in a psychiatry core clerkship: an observational study

机译:基于工作场所的委托专业活动评估精神科核心职员:一个观察研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in competency-based, undergraduate medical education (UME) have led to new formative workplace-based assessments (WBA) using entrustment-supervision scales in clerkships. We conducted an observational, prospective cohort study to explore the usefulness of a WBA designed to assess core EPAs in a psychiatry clerkship. We analyzed changes in self-entrustment ratings of students and the supervisors’ ratings per EPA. Timing and frequencies of learner-initiated WBAs based on a prospective entrustment-supervision scale and resultant narrative feedback were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Predictors for indirect supervision levels were explored via regression analysis, and narrative feedback was coded using thematic content analysis. Students evaluated the WBA after each clerkship rotation. EPA 1 (“Take a patient’s history”), EPA 2 (“Assess physical & mental status”) and EPA 8 (“Document & present a clinical encounter”) were most frequently used for learner-initiated WBAs throughout the clerkship rotations in a sample of 83 students. Clinical residents signed off on the majority of the WBAs (71%). EPAs 1, 2, and 8 showed the largest increases in self-entrustment and received most of the indirect supervision level ratings. We found a moderate, positive correlation between self-entrusted supervision levels at the end of the clerkship and the number of documented entrustment-supervision ratings per EPA (p??0.0001). The number of entrustment ratings explained 6.5% of the variance in the supervisors’ ratings for EPA 1. Narrative feedback was documented for 79% (n?=?214) of the WBAs. Most narratives addressed the Medical Expert role (77%, n?=?208) and used reinforcement (59%, n?=?161) as a feedback strategy. Students perceived the feedback as beneficial. Using formative WBAs with an entrustment-supervision scale and prompts for written feedback facilitated targeted, high-quality feedback and effectively supported students’ development toward self-entrusted, indirect supervision levels.
机译:委托专业活动(EPAS)以竞受能力为基础,本科医学教育(UME)导致了新的工作场所基于工作场所的评估(WBA),使用委托监督秤在职。我们进行了一个观察性的预期队列研究,探讨了WBA旨在评估精神病学职员中的核心EPA的有用性。我们分析了每EPA的自我委托评级和监事评级的变化。学习者启动的WBA的定时和频率基于预期委托监督规模和结果叙述反馈进行了定量和定性。通过回归分析探索间接监督水平的预测因子,并使用主题内容分析编码叙述反馈。学生在每个职员旋转后评估WBA。 EPA 1(“患者的历史”),EPA 2(“评估身体和精神状态”)和EPA 8(“文件和临床遭遇”)最常用于学习者启动的WBA,在整个职员旋转中83名学生的样本。临床居民签署了大部分WBA(71%)。 EPA 1,2和8显示了自委托的最大增加,并获得了大部分间接监督水平评级。我们在职员结束时发现自委托监督水平与每EPA的记录委托监管额定值的数量之间的适度,正相关性(P?&?0.0001)。委托额定值的数量解释了6.5%的EPA评级的差异1.叙述反馈记录在WBA的79%(N?= 214)。大多数叙述都致力于医学专家角色(77%,N?= 208),并使用加固(59%,N?= 161)作为反馈策略。学生认为反馈是有益的。使用具有委托监督规模的表现型WBA和提示书面反馈促进了目标,高质量的反馈,并有效地支持学生对自委托,间接监督水平的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号