...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Predicting Oral Beta-lactam susceptibilities against Streptococcus pneumoniae
【24h】

Predicting Oral Beta-lactam susceptibilities against Streptococcus pneumoniae

机译:预测口腔β-内酰胺祛痘对肺炎链球菌的敏感性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Oral beta-lactam antimicrobials are not routinely tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae due to presumed susceptibility based upon penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing. Currently, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute provides comments to use penicillin MIC ≤0.06 to predict oral cephalosporin susceptibility. However, no guidance is provided when cefotaxime MIC is known, leading to uncertainty with interpretation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cefotaxime and penicillin MICs and their respective correlation to oral beta-lactam categorical susceptibility patterns. 249?S. pneumoniae isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF) and then tested by broth microdilution method to penicillin, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, cefdinir, cefpodoxime, and cefuroxime. Using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) non-meningitis breakpoints for cefotaxime, 240/249 isolates were classified as susceptible. Of the cefotaxime susceptible isolates, 23% of the isolates are misrepresented as cefdinir susceptible. Amoxicillin correlated well with penicillin MIC breakpoints with only 1 discordant isolate out of 249. The correlation between amoxicillin and penicillin creates a very reliable predictor to determine categorical susceptibility. However oral cephalosporins were not well predicted by either penicillin or cefotaxime leading to the possible risk of treatment failures. Caution should be used when transitioning to oral cephalosporins in cefotaxime susceptible isolates, especially with higher cefotaxime MICs.
机译:由于基于青霉素最小抑制浓度(MIC)测试,口服β-内酰胺抗微生物抗微生物未对链球菌肺炎料进行常规测试。目前,临床和实验室标准研究所提供了使用青霉素MIC≤0.06来预测口腔头孢菌素易感性的评论。然而,当Cefotaxime MIC已知时,没有提供指导,从而导致具有解释的不确定性。本研究的目的是评估头孢噻肟和青霉素MICS及其与口服β-内酰胺分类易感性模式的各自相关性。 249?s。通过基质辅助激光解吸电离 - 飞行质谱(MALDI-TOF)鉴定肺炎群分离物,然后通过肉汤微量脱硫法测试青霉素,头孢噻肟,阿莫西林,头孢丙胺,头孢噻肟和头孢呋辛。使用临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)脑梗死的非脑膜炎断裂点,240/249分离株分类为易感。在头孢噻肟敏感的分离物中,23%的分离物被误陈述为Cefdinir易感。 Amoxicillin与青霉素MIC断点相关,只有1个不和谐的孤立分子,其中249中只有1个不和谐的孤立。阿莫西林和青霉素之间的相关性产生了非常可靠的预测因子,以确定分类易感性。然而,口服头孢菌素不能通过青霉素或头孢噻肟预测,导致治疗失败可能的风险。在转移到头孢噻肟易感分离株中的口腔头孢菌素时应使用小心,特别是具有较高的头孢噻肟麦克风。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号