首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements
【24h】

Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements

机译:基于指南的质量保证:关键要素定义的概念框架

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background In 2017, the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for the definition, the conceptual underpinnings and the way QA relates to health questions that are answered in guidelines. The objective of this final of three articles is to propose a conceptual framework for an integrated approach to guideline and QA development and clarify terms and definitions for key elements. This work will inform the upcoming European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (ECICC). Methods A multidisciplinary group of 23 experts from key organizations in the fields of guideline development, performance measurement and quality assurance participated in a mixed method approach including face-to-face dialogue and several rounds of virtual meetings. Informed by results of a systematic literature review that indicated absence of an existing framework and practical examples, we first identified the relations of key elements in guideline-based QA and then developed appropriate concepts and terminology to provide guidance. Results Our framework connects the three key concepts of quality indicators, performance measures and performance indicators integrated with guideline development. Quality indicators are constructs used as a guide to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of the structure, process and outcomes of healthcare services; performance measures are tools that quantify or describe measurable elements of practice performance; and performance indicators are quantifiable and measurable units or scores of practice, which should be guided by guideline recommendations. Conclusions The inconsistency in the way key terms of QA are used and defined has confused the field. Our conceptual framework defines the role, meaning and interactions of the key elements for improving quality in healthcare. It directly builds on the questions asked in guidelines and answered through recommendations. These findings will be applied in the forthcoming ECICC and for the future updates of ECIBC. These are large-scale integrated projects aimed at improving healthcare quality across Europe through the development of guideline-based QA schemes; this will help in implementing and improving our approach.
机译:摘要背景2017年,欧盟委员会的联合研究中心(JRC)开始为基于指南的质量保证(QA)计划开发一种方法论框架,以改善癌症的护理质量。在工作的第一阶段,出现了关于定义术语的使用的不一致,概念内限和QA涉及在指南中回答的健康问题。本决赛的目的是提出了一个概念框架,以便为指南和QA开发的综合方法提出综合方法,并澄清关键要素的条款和定义。这项工作将通知即将举行的欧盟委员会关于结肠直肠癌(ECICC)的倡议。方法采用指南开发领域的关键组织的23个专家组的多学科组合,绩效测量和质量保证参加了一种混合方法方法,包括面对面对话和几轮虚拟会议。通过显示系统文献综述的结果,表明存在现有框架和实际示例,我们首先确定了基于指南的QA中关键要素的关系,然后制定了适当的概念和术语来提供指导。结果我们的框架连接了与指南开发集成的质量指标,性能措施和绩效指标的三个关键概念。质量指标是用作监测,评估和提高医疗保健服务结构,过程和结果质量的指南的结构;性能措施是量化或描述可衡量实践表现要素的工具;绩效指标是可量化和可衡量的单位或练习的可测量单位或得分,应该通过指导意见引导。结论使用QA的关键条款和定义的方式的不一致困惑了该领域。我们的概念框架定义了改善医疗保健质量的关键要素的作用,含义和相互作用。它直接建立在指南中提出的问题并通过建议回答。这些调查结果将适用于即将举行的Ecicc和ECIBC的未来更新。这些是大型综合项目,旨在通过基于指南的QA计划的发展改善欧洲的医疗质量;这将有助于实施和提高我们的方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号