首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Moral distress and ethical climate in intensive care medicine during COVID-19: a nationwide study
【24h】

Moral distress and ethical climate in intensive care medicine during COVID-19: a nationwide study

机译:Covid-19期间重症监护医学中的道德窘迫与道德气候:全国范围

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19. An extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19. Three hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. “Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families” was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect, ethical awareness and support. “Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions” and “Self-reflective and empowering leadership” received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p??0.001) and intensivists (p??0.05) compared to one year prior. Levels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.
机译:Covid-19大流行为重症监护单位(ICU)专业人士创造了道德挑战,可能导致道德困扰。本研究探讨了Covid-19期间荷兰德鲁斯道德困扰和道德气候的水平和原因。为医疗保健专业人员(MMD-HP)(MMD-HP)和道德决策的延长版本衡量气候调查问卷(EDMCQ)在所有84个ICU中在线分发。在Covid-19前一年与历史对照组相比,护士和强度主义者的道德遇险分数。三百四十五名护士(70.7%),40名强烈主义者(8.2%)和103名支持人员(21.1%)完成了调查。护士的道德困扰水平高于支持员工。强度主义者的道德困扰水平与护士和支持员工的友好差异显着。 “对患者的情绪支持不足,他们的家属是所有专业人士群体的道德窘迫最高的最高原因。在所有因素中,所有职业都评为相互尊重,道德意识和支持的文化最积极的道德气候。 “不避免生命结束的文化”和“自我反思和赋权领导”获得最低平均分数。对于ICU护士(P = 0.001)和强烈的患者(p≤0.05),Covid-19期间的道德遇险分数显着降低。国际法院专业人员之间的道德困境的水平与原因不同,与历史对照组不同。有针对性的干预措施来解决危机期间的道德困扰是可取的,以改善ICU专业人员和患者护理质量的心理健康和保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号