...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >The effect of nudges on autonomy in hypothetical and real life settings
【24h】

The effect of nudges on autonomy in hypothetical and real life settings

机译:讽刺对假设和现实生活中的自主性的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nudges have repeatedly been found to be effective, however they are claimed to harm autonomy, and it has been found that laypeople expect this too. To test whether these expectations translate to actual harm to experienced autonomy, three online studies were conducted. The paradigm used in all studies was that participants were asked to voluntarily participate in a longer version of the questionnaire. This was either done in a hypothetical setting, where participants imagined they were asked this question, but did not answer it, and reported their expectations for autonomy; Or in an actual choice setting where participants answered the question and then reported their actual autonomy. The first study utilized the hypothetical setting and tried to replicate that laypeople expect nudges to harm autonomy with the current paradigm. A total of 451 participants were randomly assigned to either a control, a default nudge, or a social norm nudge condition. In the default nudge condition, the affirmative answer was pre-selected, and in the social norm nudge condition it was stated that most people answered affirmative. The results showed a trend for lower expected autonomy in nudge conditions, but did not find significant evidence. In Study 2, with a sample size of 454, the same design was used in an actual choice setting. Only the default nudge was found to be effective, and no difference in autonomy was found. In Study 3, Studies 1 and 2 were replicated. Explanation of the nudge was added as an independent variable and the social norm nudge condition was dropped, resulting in six conditions and 1322 participants. The results showed that participants indeed expected default nudges to harm their autonomy, but only if the nudge was explained. When actually nudged, no effect on autonomy was found, independent of the presence of an explanation.
机译:反复发现讽刺是有效的,但是他们被声称伤害自主权,并且已经发现Paypeople也期待这一点。为了测试这些预期是否转化为对经验丰富的自治的实际危害,进行了三项在线研究。所有研究中使用的范式是,参与者被要求自愿参与调查问卷的更长版本。这是在假设的环境中完成的,参与者想象他们被问到他们这个问题,但没有回答它,并报告了他们对自治的期望;或者在参与者回答问题的实际选择环境中,然后报告了他们的实际自治。第一项研究利用假设的环境,并试图复制这些人希望用当前范式造成伤害自主的。共有451名参与者被随机分配给一个控制,默认提升或社会规范趋势状况。在默认的轻推状态下,肯定答案是预先选择的,并且在社会常规下行条件下,它据称大多数人都回答了肯定。结果表明,龙头条件下预期的预期自治趋势,但没有找到重要的证据。在研究2中,具有454的样本大小,在实际选择设置中使用相同的设计。只发现默认的轻推是有效的,发现自主权没有差异。在研究3中,复制研究1和2。将轻推的解释加入为独立变量,滴加社会规范的暗示条件,导致六种条件和1322名参与者。结果表明,参与者确实预期违约措施损害了他们的自主权,而是才能解释一下。当实际上熄灭时,没有发现对自主权的影响,独立于解释的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号