...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells
【24h】

Application of a cost-effective DNA extraction protocol for screening transgenic and CRISPR-edited primary goat cells

机译:经济高效的DNA提取方案筛选转基因和CRISPR型原发性山羊细胞的应用

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The genotyping of genetically-modified cells is a crucial step in studies of transgenics and genomic editing with systems such as CRISPR/Cas. The detection of genome editing events can be directly related to the genotyping methodology used, which is influenced by its costs, since many experiments require the analysis of a large number of samples. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of direct lysis methods of genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction for the detection of knockins and knockouts in primary goat cells. Initially, three gDNA extraction protocols (protocol A, heat denaturation/freeze-thaw in water; protocol B, heat denaturation/proteinase K; and protocol C, CellsDirect Kit) were tested using different quantities (1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 cells) and types of goat primary cells (fibroblasts and goat mammary epithelial cells—GMECs) for subsequent validation by PCR amplification of small ( GAPDH ) and large amplicons (hLF transgene). All protocols were successful in the detection of the small amplicon; however, in GMECs, only protocol B resulted efficient amplification (protocol A—0%, protocol B—93%, protocol C—13.33%, P 0.05). In a proof-of-principle experiment, the TP53 gene was knocked out in GMECs by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion while constructs containing the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (pBC-anti-VEGF) and bacterial L-Asparaginase (pBC-ASNase) transgenes were knocked-in separately in fibroblasts. Detection of successful editing was performed using protocol B and PCR. The integration rates of the pBC-ASNase and pBC-anti-VEGF transgenes were 93.6% and 72%, respectively, as per PCR. The efficiency of biallelic editing in GMECs using CRISPR/Cas9 for the TP53 deletion was 5.4%. Our results suggest that protocol B (heat denaturation/proteinase K) can be used as an inexpensive and quick methodology for detecting genetic modifications in different types of primary goat cells, with efficiency rates consistent with values previously described in the literature when using extraction kits or more complex proteinase K formulations.
机译:遗传修饰的细胞的基因分型是用诸如CRISPR / CAS等系统进行转基因和基因组编辑的关键步骤。基因组编辑事件的检测可以与所用基因分型方法直接相关,其受其成本影响,因为许多实验需要分析大量样品。本研究的目的是比较基因组DNA(GDNA)提取的直接裂解方法对原发性山羊细胞中的敲扣和敲除进行比较。最初,使用不同量(1,000,5,000和10,000个细胞)测试三种GDNA提取方案(方案A,热变性/冻融脂肪,加热变性/冻解 - 解冻,热变性/蛋白酶K;和方案C,细胞一致试剂盒)和类型山羊原发性细胞(成纤维细胞和山羊乳腺上皮细胞-GMEC)通过PCR扩增的小(GAPDH)和大型扩增子(HLF转基因)的验证。所有协议都在检测到小型扩增子方面是成功的;然而,在GmeCs中,只有协议B导致有效扩增(方案A-0%,方案B-93%,方案C-13.33%,P <0.05)。在原则上的实验中,TP53基因通过CRISPR / CAS9介导的缺失在GMEC中敲除,而含有抗VEGF单克隆抗体(PBC-抗VEGF)和细菌L-天冬酰胺酶(PBC- asnase)的构建体转基因分别在成纤维细胞中被敲入。使用协议B和PCR进行成功编辑的检测。 PBC-Asnase和PBC-抗VEGF转基因的整合率分别为PCR分别为93.6%和72%。使用CRISPR / CAS9用于TP53缺失的GMEC中的双腿编辑的效率为5.4%。我们的研究结果表明,协议B(热变性/蛋白酶K)可以用作检测不同类型的原发性山羊细胞中的遗传修饰的廉价且快速的方法,其效率率与先前在文献中使用提取套件或者更复杂的蛋白酶K配方。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号