首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Exploring the Dimensional Structure of Bullying Victimization Among Primary and Lower-Secondary School Students: Is One Factor Enough, or Do We Need More?
【24h】

Exploring the Dimensional Structure of Bullying Victimization Among Primary and Lower-Secondary School Students: Is One Factor Enough, or Do We Need More?

机译:探索小学和中学生欺凌受害的尺寸结构:是足够的一个因素,或者我们需要更多吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

In adolescence, bullying victimization is typically represented in terms of a three-fold factor structure reflecting three components of verbal, physical, and social victimization. Recent studies have suggested the usefulness of alternativte models including both general and component-specific factors. In this study, we assessed the empirical and theoretical validity of an instrument assessing verbal, physical and social victimization using a set of alternative models of victimization: a unidimensional model, a three-factor model, and a bifactor model. Association between emerging factors and student variables were explored to establish theoretical fit of the models. Sample consisted of upper primary and lower secondary school students [ N = 1311; 53% Male; Mean age ( SD ) = 10.73 (1.45)] and their teachers. The three factor and bifactor models showed good fit. In spite of acceptable fit, the unidimensional model showed lower empirical support when compared with the other models. The dimensions of the three-factor model showed similar associations with most student variables, while the bifactor showed more heterogeneous, and theoretically coherent associations. General victimization decreased with age and was positively related with externalizing and internalizing symptoms, student–teacher conflict and negative expectations. Verbal victimization showed increased prevalence among girls and older students. Physical victimization showed increased prevalence among boys and younger students, and positive associations with externalizing symptoms and student–teacher conflict. Social victimization was more frequent among girls, and positively related with internalizing symptoms and negative expectations toward teachers. These findings highlight the usefulness of modeling victimization using both general and form-specific dimensions for both assessment and theory-building purposes.
机译:在青春期中,欺凌受害通常代表三倍因子结构,反映了三个口头,物理和社会受害的组成部分。最近的研究表明,包括一般和组分特定因素的替代模型的有用性。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用一组替代模型评估口头,身体和社会受害的仪器的实证和理论有效性:一个单向模型,三因素模型和双击模型。探讨了新兴因素和学生变量之间的关联,以建立模型的理论拟合。样本由上部中小学和下部学生[n = 1311; 53%男性;平均年龄(SD)= 10.73(1.45)]及其老师。三个因素和双手型模型显示出良好的合适。尽管有可接受的拟合,但与其他模型相比,单向模型显示出较低的经验支持。三因素模型的尺寸显示出与大多数学生变量类似的关联,而双移位器显示出更异质和理论上相干的关联。一般受害者随着年龄的增长而减少,与外部化和内部化症状,学生 - 教师冲突和负期望有关。口头受害者在女孩和老年学生之间表现出增加。物理受害表明,男孩和年轻学生之间的流行增加,以及与外化症状和学生教师冲突的积极协会。社会受害者在女孩中更频繁,与内部化症状和对教师的负面期望呈积极相关。这些发现突出了使用一般和特定于评估和理论建设目的使用普通和特定尺寸建模受害的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号