首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Sex Representation in Clinical Trials Associated with FDA Cancer Drug Approvals Differs Between Solid and Hematologic Malignancies
【24h】

Sex Representation in Clinical Trials Associated with FDA Cancer Drug Approvals Differs Between Solid and Hematologic Malignancies

机译:与FDA癌症药物认证相关的临床试验中的性表现在固体和血液学恶性肿瘤之间不同

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Proportionate female representation in health research is necessary for scientific rigor and health equity. We aimed to assess the representation of women in clinical trials leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cancer drug approvals. Materials and Methods Trials supporting FDA cancer drug approvals between July 2008 and June 2018 were sourced from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov . The ratio of female to male trial enrollment was compared with cancer incidence and mortality in the U.S. using International Agency for Research on Cancer data. Reproductive tract and breast cancers were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing trial enrollment with population incidence and mortality were calculated. Results A total of 186 trials leading to 170 FDA cancer drug approvals showed slight female underrepresentation compared with overall cancer incidence in the U.S. (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95–0.98, p .0001). Female enrollment for drugs approved between 2008–2013 and 2014–2018 was unchanged (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99–1.05, p = .25). There was slight female underrepresentation in hematological trials (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.998; p = .040 for leukemia; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90–0.997; p = .040 for lymphoma) and significant female underrepresentation in colorectal (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69–0.76; p .0001), pancreas (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78–0.93; p = .0004), lung (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75–0.80; p .0001), kidney (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60–0.67; p .0001), and thyroid cancer trials (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.23–0.28; p .0001) compared with U.S. incidence. Conclusion Female underrepresentation has persisted within solid organ tumor trials but is less notable in hematologic trials. Additional work is required to identify drivers of such disparity. Implications for Practice Adequate gender representation in clinical trials is a matter of health equity. This study demonstrates that women remain underrepresented in trials across hematological and solid organ trials compared with cancer incidence and mortality in women, with the disparity worse in a number of solid organ tumor types. There are thus still significant improvements to be made regarding adequate representation of women in trials. Studies exploring the reasons for ongoing disparity in gender representation are warranted to help clinicians to rectify this.
机译:背景技术卫生研究中的相称女性表示是科学严谨与健康股权所必需的。我们的目标是评估妇女在导致美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)癌症药物批准的临床试验中的代表性。支持FDA癌症2008年7月至2018年6月至2018年6月的FDA癌症药物批准的材料和方法是由PubMed和Clinicaltrials.gov提供的。将女性与男性试验招生的比率与美国癌症发病率和死亡率进行比较。使用国际癌症数据研究。排除生殖道和乳腺癌。计算了比较患有人口发病率和死亡率的试验和死亡率的赔率比(或)和95%的置信区间(CIs)。结果总共186名癌症患者批准的试验表明,与美国的总癌症发病率相比,患有较小的女性强硬症。(或0.97; 95%CI,0.95-0.98,P& .0001)。 2008 - 2013年至2014 - 2018年批准的药物的母增药不变(或1.02; 95%CI,0.99-1.05,P = .25)。血液学试验中有轻微的雌性强硬(或0.95; 95%CI,0.91-0.998; P = .040用于白血病;或0.95; 95%CI,0.90-0.997; P = .040用于淋巴瘤)和重要的女性结直肠(或0.72; 95%CI,0.69-0.76; p& 0.85%),胰腺(或0.85; 95%CI,0.78-0.93; p = .0004),肺(或0.77; 95 %CI,0.75-0.80; p& 0001),肾脏(或0.63; 95%CI,0.60-0.67; p& .0001)和甲状腺癌试验(或0.26; 95%CI,0.23- 0.28; p& 0001)与美国发病率相比。结论女性强名持续存在于固体器官肿瘤试验中,但在血液学试验中不太显着。需要额外的工作来识别这种差异的驱动程序。对实践的影响充分性别在临床试验中的性别代表性是卫生股权的问题。本研究表明,与癌症发病率和女性死亡率相比,妇女在血液学和固体器官试验中的试验中仍然受到尊重,并且在许多固体器官肿瘤类型中差异差异。因此,关于妇女在试验中的适当代表性,仍有显着的改进。探索性别代表中持续差异的原因的研究是有助于帮助临床医生纠正这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号