首页> 外文期刊>The Ochsner Journal >Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy
【24h】

Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy

机译:经皮胃术治疗抗血小板治疗患者的安全性和可行性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Guidelines recommend the discontinuation of clopidogrel prior to gastrostomy tube placement. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of performing radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement in patients taking clopidogrel and/or aspirin.Methods: We performed an institutional review board–approved retrospective analysis of the medical records for 237 consecutive patients following RIG tube placement secondary to dysphagia from August 2017 to January 2019. Antiplatelet medications and RIG type placement techniques (push vs pull) were compared with bleeding complications. Complications were categorized based on the Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. Of the 237 patients with RIG tubes placed, 77 patients were on antiplatelet therapy: 55 on single antiplatelet therapy and 22 on dual antiplatelet therapy. Of the 55 patients on single antiplatelet therapy, 26 were taking clopidogrel and 29 were taking aspirin.Results: A total of 9 bleeding complications were observed. The most common complication was minimal bleeding or hematoma around the incision site (n=7). No statistically significant increase was seen in bleeding rates when comparing patients on any antiplatelet therapy regimen vs none ( P =0.15), single antiplatelet therapy vs none ( P =0.13), clopidogrel vs none ( P =0.71), or dual antiplatelet therapy vs none ( P =0.61). No significant increase in the bleeding complication rate was noted when comparing the aspirin-only regimen vs clopidogrel alone ( P =0.34).Conclusion: These findings suggest that the risk of bleeding complications is not increased in patients taking clopidogrel and/or aspirin prior to RIG tube placement. Keywords: Aspirin , clopidogrel , gastrostomy , hemorrhage , platelet aggregation inhibitors INTRODUCTIONPercutaneous gastrostomy tubes are often placed for dysphagia and risk of aspiration secondary to stroke.~(1) A 2017 update from the American Heart Association (AHA) stated that approximately 795,000 strokes occur annually in the United States,~(2) and 8% to 20% of stroke patients require either short- or long-term enteral tube feeding.~(3) Evidence shows that early tube feeding following stroke has a survival benefit.~(4) As a result, a large population of patients require gastrostomy tube placement.Current (2014) AHA and American Stroke Association (ASA) recommendations for acute management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and ischemic stroke include the use of single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel) or dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel).~(5) Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke following acute TIA and minor ischemic stroke in the first 90 days.~(6) Patients who have had strokes are routinely placed on an antiplatelet therapy regimen because of these findings.Endoscopic- and image-guided methods have been proven to be safe and effective for placement of percutaneous gastrostomy tubes.~(7) The current (2011) standard of practice for gastrostomy tube placement is based on multidisciplinary practical guidelines from the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and the American Gastroenterological Association Institute.~(8) These guidelines include recommendations from both the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and the SIR on radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement for patients prescribed antiplatelet therapy. The ASGE considers RIG tube placement a high-risk procedure and recommends withholding clopidogrel for 7 days and replacing it with aspirin. The SIR considers RIG tube placement a moderate risk for hemorrhage and recommends withholding clopidogrel for 5 days but does not recommend withholding aspirin.While studies have evaluated the safety of performing endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients taking clopidogrel or dual antiplatelet therapy, as of 2020, little had been published in the radiologic literature evaluating the safety and feasibility of gastrostomy tube placement in the angiography suite in patients taking single or dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of placing RIG tubes in patients taking single or dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and/or clopidogrel.METHODSAn institutional review board (IRB)–approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant retrospective review was conducted for all patients who had a RIG tube placed between August 1, 2017 and January 18, 2019 at a single institution. Informed consent was waived by the IRB. The Epic electronic medical record (Epic Systems Inc) was queried during the study dates for all patients who presented to interventional radiology for RIG tube placement. Inpatient and outpatient populations were included. Antiplatelet therapy regimen and RIG tube type (push vs pull) were collected.Patients who received
机译:背景:准则建议在胃造影管放置之前停止氯吡格雷。本研究的目的是研究在服用氯吡格雷和/或阿司匹林的患者中进行放射性插入的胃术(钻机)管放置的安全性和可行性。方法:我们通过连续237次进行了一个制度审查委员会批准的回顾性分析从2017年8月到2019年8月,患者继发于吞咽困难的困扰。抗血小板药物和钻机型放置技术(推动VS拉)与出血并发症进行比较。并发症根据介入放射学临床实践指南分类。在237例钻机管患者中,77名患者在抗血小板治疗中:55例对单一抗血小板治疗和22例双抗血小板治疗。在单一抗血小板治疗的55名患者中,26名服用氯吡格雷,29种服用阿司匹林。结果:观察到9种出血并发症。最常见的并发症是切口部位周围最小的出血或血肿(n = 7)。在将患者对任何抗血小板治疗方案进行比较时,在出血率没有(P = 0.15),单一抗血小板治疗VS(p = 0.13),氯吡格雷没有(p = 0.71),或双抗血小板治疗与没有(p = 0.61)。在比较仅阿司匹林的方案VS氯吡格雷(P = 0.34)时没有显着增加出血并发症率钻机管放置。关键词:阿司匹林,氯吡格雷,胃术,出血,血小板聚集抑制剂引入患有困难的胃囊术,吞咽困难和中风中的吸入风险。〜(1)来自美国心脏协会(AHA)的2017年更新,发现了大约795,000个中风每年在美国,〜(2)和8%〜20%的中风患者需要短期或长期肠内喂养。〜(3)证据表明,卒中后的早期管喂养有生存益处。〜( 4)因此,大量患者需要胃造影管置入胃术管置入胃肠道和美国中风协会(ASA)急性缺血发作(TIA)和缺血性卒中的建议包括使用单一抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林或氯吡格雷)或双抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)。〜(5)与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的双抗血小板治疗已被证明降低复发性卒中的风险在前90天内急性TIA和轻微缺血性脑卒中。〜(6)由于这些发现,常规地将患者常规放置在抗血小板治疗方案上。已被证明是安全有效的镜片和图像引导方法用于放置经皮胃术管管。〜(7)目前(2011)胃造影管安置的实践标准是基于来自介入放射学会(SIR)和美国美食学会学会的多学科实际指导。〜(8)这些指南包括美国胃肠内镜内窥镜(ASGE)的建议,以及针对患者进行抗血小板治疗的患者的放射性插入的胃造口术(钻机)管置的先生。 Asge考虑钻机管放置高风险的程序,并建议扣留氯吡格雷7天并用阿司匹林替换它。先生考虑钻机管置于出血的适度风险,并建议扣留氯吡格雷5天,但不建议扣留阿司匹林。根据2020,研究已经评估了氯吡格雷或双抗血小板治疗的内窥镜胃术管安置的安全性,如2020年,少量发表于放射学文献中,评估胃造影套件中胃痛管安置的安全性和可行性,以单一或双抗血小板治疗与氯吡格雷进行单一或双抗血小板治疗的患者。本研究的目的是评估患者钻机管的安全性和可行性服用阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷的单身或双抗血小板治疗。在2017年8月1日期间的钻机管和2019年1月18日在一个机构。知情同意由IRB放弃。史诗电子医疗记录(EPIC Systems Inc)在研究日期中查询所有患者介绍钻机管置的介入放射学。包括住院和门诊人口。收集抗血小板治疗方案和钻机型(推动VS拉力)。收到的分类

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号