首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Consensus-Based Expert Development of Critical Items for Direct Observation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills
【24h】

Consensus-Based Expert Development of Critical Items for Direct Observation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills

机译:基于共识的专家开发关键项目,用于直接观察护理点超声技能

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in a number of medical specialties. To support competency-based POCUS education, workplace-based assessments are essential.ObjectiveWe developed a consensus-based assessment tool for POCUS skills and determined which items are critical for competence. We then performed standards setting to set cut scores for the tool.MethodsUsing a modified Delphi technique, 25 experts voted on 32 items over 3 rounds between August and December 2016. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 80% of the experts. Twelve experts then performed 3 rounds of a standards setting procedure in March 2017 to establish cut scores.ResultsExperts reached consensus for 31 items to include in the tool. Experts reached consensus that 16 of those items were critically important. A final cut score for the tool was established at 65.2% (SD 17.0%). Cut scores for critical items are significantly higher than those for noncritical items (76.5% ± SD 12.4% versus 53.1% ± SD 12.2%, P < .0001).ConclusionsWe reached consensus on a 31-item workplace-based assessment tool for identifying competence in POCUS. Of those items, 16 were considered critically important. Their importance is further supported by higher cut scores compared with noncritical items.
机译:背景技术超声(PoCus)越来越多地用于许多医学专业。为了支持基于能力的POCUS教育,基于工作场所的评估是必需的.ObjectiveWe为PoCus技能制定了一项基于共识的评估工具,并确定了哪些物品对于能力至关重要。然后,我们执行了标准设置,以便为工具设置削减分数。一项改进的Delphi技术,25个专家在8月至2016年8月之间的32轮投票中投票32件。达成共识至少80%的专家达成协议。然后,十二名专家于2017年3月进行了3轮标准设置程序,以建立削减得分。结果XPerts达成了31项以内的31项达成共识。专家们达成共识,其中16个项目中的16项批判性重要。该工具的最终切割得分于65.2%(SD 17.0%)。关键物品的切割分数明显高于非关键项项目(76.5%±SD 12.4%而与53.1%±SD 12.2%,P <.0001).Conclusionswe达成了31项基于工作场所的基于工作场所的评估工具的共识,以确定能力在pocus。其中,16项被认为是至关重要的。与非关键项项目相比,他们的重要性进一步得到了更高的分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号