...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda
【24h】

A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda

机译:乌干达农村医院废物管理的整个系统方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Safe waste management protects hospital staff, the public, and the local environment. The handling of hospital waste in Bwindi Community Hospital did not appear to conform to the hospital waste management plan, exhibiting poor waste segregation, transportation, storage, and disposal which could lead to environmental and occupational risks. Methods: We undertook a mixed-methods study. We used semi-structured interviews to assess the awareness of clinical and non-clinical staff of waste types, risks, good practice, and concerns about hospital waste management. We quantified waste production by five departments for 1 month. We assessed the standard of practice in segregation, onsite transportation, use of personal protective equipment, onsite storage of solid waste, and disposal of compostable waste and chemicals. Results: Clinical staff had good awareness of waste (types, risk) overall, but the knowledge of non-clinical staff was much poorer. There was a general lack of insight into correct personal or departmental practice, resulting in incorrect segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source (93% of time), and incorrect onsite transportation (94% of time). In 1 month the five departments produced 5,398 kg of hazardous and non-hazardous waste (12; 88%, respectively). Good practice included the correct use of sharps and vial boxes and keeping the clinical area clear of litter (90% of the time); placentae buried immediately (80% of the time); gloves were worn everyday by waste handlers, but correct heavy-duty gloves 33% of the time, reflecting the variable use of other personal protective equipment. Chemical waste drained to underground soakaways, but tracking further disposal was not possible. Correct segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source, and correct onsite transportation, only occurred 6% of the time. Conclusion: Waste management was generally below the required WHO standards. This exposes people and the wider environment, including the nearby world heritage site, home to the endangered mountain gorilla, to unnecessary risks. It is likely that the same is true in similar situations elsewhere. Precautions, protection, and dynamic policy making should be prioritized in these hospital settings and developing countries.
机译:简介:安全废物管理保护医院工作人员,公众和当地环境。 Bwindi社区医院的医院废物的处理似乎并未符合医院废物管理计划,呈现出可怜的废物隔离,运输,储存和处置,这可能导致环境和职业风险。方法:我们进行了混合方法研究。我们使用半结构性访谈来评估对废物类型,风险,良好做法的临床和非临床人员的意识,以及对医院废物管理的担忧。我们量化了五个部门的废物生产1个月。我们评估了隔离,现场运输,使用个人防护装备,实体储存固体废物的实践标准,以及可堆肥废物和化学品的处置。结果:临床人员总体上良好地了解废物(类型,风险),但非临床工作人员的知识较差。普遍缺乏洞察力对正确的个人或部门实践,导致临床和可堆肥废物的次数不正确(& 93%),以及不正确的现场运输(94%的时间)。 1个月,五个部门生产了5,398公斤的危险和非危险废物(分别为88%)。良好的做法包括正确使用锐利和小瓶盒,并保持休闲垃圾的临床区域(90%的时间);胎盘立即埋葬(& 80%的时间);手套每天都被废物处理程序佩戴,但纠正重型手套& 33%的时间,反映了其他个人防护设备的可变使用。化学废物排出到地下索拉明,但不可能跟踪进一步处置。在源头校正临床和可堆肥废物的偏析,并正确现场运输,只发生了6%的时间。结论:废物管理通常低于所需的标准。这使人和更广泛的环境暴露,包括附近的世界遗产,濒临灭绝的山大猩猩,不必要的风险。在其他地方的类似情况下,很可能是真实的。应在这些医院环境和发展中国家优先考虑预防措施,保护和动态政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号