首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda
【2h】

A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda

机译:乌干达农村医院废物管理的全系统方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Safe waste management protects hospital staff, the public, and the local environment. The handling of hospital waste in Bwindi Community Hospital did not appear to conform to the hospital waste management plan, exhibiting poor waste segregation, transportation, storage, and disposal which could lead to environmental and occupational risks.>Methods: We undertook a mixed-methods study. We used semi-structured interviews to assess the awareness of clinical and non-clinical staff of waste types, risks, good practice, and concerns about hospital waste management. We quantified waste production by five departments for 1 month. We assessed the standard of practice in segregation, onsite transportation, use of personal protective equipment, onsite storage of solid waste, and disposal of compostable waste and chemicals.>Results: Clinical staff had good awareness of waste (types, risk) overall, but the knowledge of non-clinical staff was much poorer. There was a general lack of insight into correct personal or departmental practice, resulting in incorrect segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source (>93% of time), and incorrect onsite transportation (94% of time). In 1 month the five departments produced 5,398 kg of hazardous and non-hazardous waste (12; 88%, respectively). Good practice included the correct use of sharps and vial boxes and keeping the clinical area clear of litter (90% of the time); placentae buried immediately (>80% of the time); gloves were worn everyday by waste handlers, but correct heavy-duty gloves <33% of the time, reflecting the variable use of other personal protective equipment. Chemical waste drained to underground soakaways, but tracking further disposal was not possible. Correct segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source, and correct onsite transportation, only occurred 6% of the time.>Conclusion: Waste management was generally below the required WHO standards. This exposes people and the wider environment, including the nearby world heritage site, home to the endangered mountain gorilla, to unnecessary risks. It is likely that the same is true in similar situations elsewhere. Precautions, protection, and dynamic policy making should be prioritized in these hospital settings and developing countries.
机译:>简介:安全废物管理可以保护医院员工,公众和当地环境。布恩迪社区医院的医院废物处理工作似乎不符合医院废物管理计划,废物分类,运输,存储和处置不善,可能导致环境和职业风险。>方法:我们进行了混合方法研究。我们使用半结构化访谈来评估临床和非临床工作人员对废物类型,风险,良好实践以及对医院废物管理的关注的意识。我们对五个部门的废物产生进行了1个月的量化。我们评估了隔离,现场运输,使用个人防护设备,现场处置固体废物以及处理可堆肥废物和化学品的实践标准。>结果:临床人员对废物(类型(风险),但非临床人员的知识要差得多。普遍缺乏对正确的个人或部门实践的洞察力,从而导致源头上的临床废物和可堆肥废物分类不正确(> 93%的时间),以及不正确的现场运输(94%的时间)。在五个月的时间里,五个部门共生产了5398公斤危险废物和非危险废物(分别为12个和88%)。良好做法包括正确使用利器和药瓶盒,并保持临床区域无垃圾(90%的时间);立即将胎盘埋藏(> 80%的时间);废物处理者每天都要戴手套,但正确的重型手套的使用率<33%,反映了其他个人防护设备使用的不固定。化学废物排到地下索道,但无法追踪进一步处置。正确地将临床废物和可堆肥废物从源头正确分类,并进行正确的现场运输,只有6%的时间。>结论:废物管理通常低于WHO规定的标准。这使人和更广泛的环境(包括附近的世界遗产遗址,濒临灭绝的大猩猩的家园)暴露在不必要的风险之下。在其他地方的类似情况下,可能也是如此。这些医院和发展中国家应优先考虑预防措施,保护措施和动态决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号