首页> 外文期刊>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions >A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (V3.7.1) in the presence of low-level jets
【24h】

A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (V3.7.1) in the presence of low-level jets

机译:在低级别喷射器存在下,使用天气研究和预测(WRF)模型(V3.7.1)中的两个唤醒参数的风电场效应案例

获取原文
           

摘要

While the wind farm parameterization by Fitch et?al. ( 2012 ) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model has been used and evaluated frequently, the explicit wake parameterization (EWP) by Volker et?al. ( 2015 ) is less well explored. The openly available high-frequency flight measurements from B?rfuss et?al. ( 2019 a ) provide an opportunity to directly compare the simulation results from the EWP and Fitch scheme with in situ measurements. In doing so, this study aims to complement the recent study by Siedersleben et?al. ( 2020 ) by (1) comparing the EWP and Fitch schemes in terms of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and velocity deficit, together with FINO?1 measurements and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, and (2) exploring the interactions of the wind farm with low-level jets (LLJs). This is done using a bug-fixed WRF version that includes the correct TKE advection, following Archer et?al. ( 2020 ) . Both the Fitch and the EWP schemes can capture the mean wind field in the presence of the wind farm consistently and well. TKE in the EWP scheme is significantly underestimated, suggesting that an explicit turbine-induced TKE source should be included in addition to the implicit source from shear. The value of the correction factor for turbine-induced TKE generation in the Fitch scheme has a significant impact on the simulation results. The position of the LLJ nose and the shear beneath the jet nose are modified by the presence of wind farms.
机译:虽然惠益et?al的风电场参数化。 (2012)在天气研究和预测(WRF)模型中经常使用和评估,Volker et?al的显式唤醒参数化(EWP)。 (2015)探索不太好。来自B的公开可用的高频飞行测量测量.RFUSS等。 (2019A)提供直接将EWP和惠誉方案与原位测量进行比较模拟结果的机会。在这样做时,这项研究旨在补充Siedersleben et?al的最近的研究。 (2020)(1)与湍流动能(TKE)和速度赤字的速率与富诺·何种测量和合成孔径雷达(SAR)数据一起比较EWP和Fitch计划,以及(2)探索的相互作用风电场与低级喷气机(LLJ)。这是使用错误固定的WRF版本完成的,该版本包括正确的TKE平流,遵循Archer et?al之后。 (2020)。惠誉和EWP方案都可以始终如一地捕捉风电场的平均风场。在EWP方案中的TKE显着低估,建议除了来自剪切的隐式源之外,应包括明确的涡轮机引起的TKE源。惠序方案中涡轮机引起的TKE生成的校正因子的值对模拟结果产生了重大影响。 LLJ鼻子的位置和喷射鼻下方的剪切通过风电场的存在来修改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号