首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions
【24h】

Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions

机译:生物质燃烧烟雾中臭氧测量方法的比较:田间和实验室条件下的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent years wildland fires in the United States have had significant impacts on local and regional air quality and negative human health outcomes. Although the primary health concerns from wildland fires come from fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), large increases in ozone (O 3 ) have been observed downwind of wildland fire plumes (DeBell et al., 2004; Bytnerowicz et al., 2010; Preisler et al., 2010; Jaffe et al., 2012; Bytnerowicz et al., 2013; Jaffe et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2016; Lindaas et al., 2017; McClure and Jaffe, 2018; Liu et al., 2018; Baylon et al., 2018; Buysse et al., 2019). Conditions generated in and around wildland fire plumes, including the presence of interfering chemical species, can make the accurate measurement of O 3 concentrations using the ultraviolet (UV) photometric method challenging if not impossible. UV photometric method instruments are prone to interferences by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are present at high concentrations in wildland fire smoke. Four different O 3 measurement methodologies were deployed in a mobile sampling platform downwind of active prescribed grassland fire lines in Kansas and Oregon and during controlled chamber burns at the United States Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, Montana. We demonstrate that the Federal Reference Method (FRM) nitric oxide (NO) chemiluminescence monitors and Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) gas-phase (NO) chemical scrubber UV photometric O 3 monitors are relatively interference-free, even in near-field combustion plumes. In contrast, FEM UV photometric O 3 monitors using solid-phase catalytic scrubbers show positive artifacts that are positively correlated with carbon monoxide (CO) and total gas-phase hydrocarbon (THC), two indicator species of biomass burning. Of the two catalytic scrubber UV photometric methods evaluated, the instruments that included a Nafion ? tube dryer in the sample introduction system had artifacts an order of magnitude smaller than the instrument with no humidity correction. We hypothesize that Nafion ? -permeating VOCs (such as aromatic hydrocarbons) could be a significant source of interference for catalytic scrubber UV photometric O 3 monitors and that the inclusion of a Nafion ? tube dryer assists with the mitigation of these interferences. The chemiluminescence FRM method is highly recommended for accurate measurements of O 3 in wildland fire plume studies and at regulatory ambient monitoring sites frequently impacted by wildland fire smoke.
机译:近年来,美国的野外火灾对地方和区域空气质量和消极人类健康成果产生了重大影响。虽然野外燃烧的主要健康问题来自细颗粒物质(PM 2.5),但是臭氧(O 3)的大幅增加被观察到荒地火灾羽毛(Debell等,2004; Bytnerowicz等,2010;预选者等,2010; jaffe等,2012年;截至2013年,2013; jaffe等,2013; ludaas等,2016; lindaas等,2017; mcclure和jaffe,2018; liu等。,2018; Baylon等,2018; Buysse等,2019)。在荒地和周围地区产生的条件,包括干扰化学物质的存在,可以使用紫外(UV)光度法挑战O 3浓度的准确测量,如果不是不可能的话,挑战。紫外线光度法仪器易于通过在荒地火焰中以高浓度存在的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)干扰。在堪萨斯州和俄勒冈州的有效规定的草原火线和控制室烧伤期间​​,在移动采样平台中部署了四种不同的o 3测量方法。在美国森林服务,蒙大拿州Missoula的落矶山脉研究站火科学实验室的受控室烧伤。我们证明了联邦参考方法(FRM)一氧化物(NO)化学发光监测器和联邦等效方法(FEM)气相(NO)化学洗涤器UV光度测量O 3监测器即使在近场燃烧羽毛中也是无截止的。 。相反,使用固相催化洗涤器的FEM UV光度O 3显示器显示出与一氧化碳(CO)和全气相烃(THC)呈正相关的正伪影,其两种生物量燃烧的指示剂。在评估的两种催化洗涤器UV光度法中,包括Nafion的仪器?当样品引入系统中的管式干燥器具有比没有湿度校正的仪器小的数量级的伪像。我们假设Nafion? - Peating VOC(如芳烃)可以是催化洗涤器UV光度O 3监测器的显着干扰源,并包含Nafion?管烘干机有助于减轻这些干扰。强烈建议化学发光FRM方法,以便在荒地火羽的研究中准确测量O 3,并在经常受到威胁火灾的监管环境监测网站。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号