...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO)
【24h】

The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO)

机译:Geriqtric干预对接受结直肠癌化疗的Freail老年患者的影响:随机试验(Gerico)

获取原文

摘要

Background Older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) experience chemotherapy dose reductions or discontinuation. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predicts survival and chemotherapy completion in patients with cancer, but the benefit of geriatric interventions remains unexplored. Methods The GERICO study is a randomised Phase 3 trial including patients ≥70 years receiving adjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy for CRC. Vulnerable patients (G8 questionnaire ≤14 points) were randomised 1:1 to CGA-based interventions or standard care, along with guideline-based chemotherapy. The primary outcome was chemotherapy completion without dose reductions or delays. Secondary outcomes were toxicity, survival and quality of life (QoL). Results Of 142 patients, 58% received adjuvant and 42% received first-line palliative chemotherapy. Interventions included medication changes (62%), nutritional therapy (51%) and physiotherapy (39%). More interventional patients completed scheduled chemotherapy compared with controls (45% vs. 28%, P ?=?0.0366). Severe toxicity occurred in 39% of controls and 28% of interventional patients ( P ?=?0.156). QoL improved in interventional patients compared with controls with the decreased burden of illness ( P ?=?0.048) and improved mobility ( P ?=?0.008). Conclusion Geriatric interventions compared with standard care increased the number of older, vulnerable patients with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy, and may improve the burden of illness and mobility. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT 02748811.
机译:背景年龄患者患有结肠直肠癌(CRC)的体验化疗剂量减少或停止。综合大枣评估(CGA)预测癌症患者的存活和化疗完成,但老年干预措施的好处仍未开发。方法Gerico研究是一种随机阶段3试验,包括≥70岁的患者接受CRC的佐剂或一线姑息性化疗。弱势患者(G8问卷≤14分)随机1:1至CGA的干预措施或标准护理,以及基于指南的化学疗法。主要结果是化疗完成,没有剂量减少或延迟。二次结果是毒性,生存和生活质量(QOL)。结果142名患者,58%接受佐剂,42%接受了一线姑息性化疗。干预措施包括药物变化(62%),营养治疗(51%)和物理治疗(39%)。更多的介入患者完成预定化疗与对照相比(45%vs.28%,p?= 0.0366)。 39%的对照组和28%的介入患者发生重症毒性(P?= 0.156)。在介入患者中改善QOL改善,与疾病负担减少(p?= 0.048)和改善的移动性(p?= 0.008)。结论Geriatric干预与标准护理相比增加了较旧的CRC患者的年龄较大的患者,可以改善疾病和流动性的负担。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT 02748811。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号