...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Not all questions are created equal – the weight of the Oxford Knee Score Questions
【24h】

Not all questions are created equal – the weight of the Oxford Knee Score Questions

机译:并非所有问题都是平等的 - 牛津膝盖的重量分数问题

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been designed for patients with knee osteoarthritis. It uses 12 questions to give an objective patient reported outcome measure. It is one of the most used questionnaires in the orthopaedic community. Each question has the same numeric value, 0-4, giving a maximal number of 48. The OKS has been observed to have a significant ceiling effect, especially when distinguishing slight postoperative differences between implant and alignment philosophies. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that each question in fact does not have the same weight for each patient, and that it depends significantly on the patient’s sociodemographic data and lifestyle. Methods: In this ethics-board approved prospective study, we included patients coming to a specialist outpatient knee clinic. Each patient filled out 3 questionnaires, in this consecutive order: demographic data (age, gender, height, weight, BMI) as well as data pertaining to the OKS, to which the patient was initially blinded for (stairs at home, self-use of a car, use of walking aids, working, previous surgery). Then the patient filled out the standard OKS. Finally, the patient gave a note on the importance of each of the question’s topics, using a 5-point Likert scale. Linear regression models were created to predict the weight of each of the questions. Results: We included 77 patients, median age 66 (IQR 18) of which were 40 women and 37 men. Median BMI was 27.7 (IQR 8.2). As for the OKS-related demographic data, 89.6% of patients had stairs, 70.1% were still driving a car, 23.4% were using walking aids, 33.7% were still working and 72.7% previous knee surgery. According to the Likert scale, the questions with the highest weight were about washing, night pain, and stability (all median 5 [IQR 1]). The questions with the lowest weight were about walking a longer distance (median 4 [2]), getting up after sitting (median 4 [1]), and kneeling (median 4 [1]). The difference between high-weighted and low-weighted questions was significant (p&0.001). A weak correlation between the recorded score and recorded question weight was observed for the question on stability (p=0.036, r=0.239) and a reverse correlation for the question on shopping (p=0.021, r=-0.263). In the regression models, question on pain was predicted by higher age (p=0.009, B = - 0.02), question on transport was predicted by the patients’ self-use of a car (p=0.008, B=0.557), question on walking for a longer period by height (p=0.02, B 0.167), weight (p=0.33, B=-0.155) and BMI (p=0.032, B=0.427), question on standing up after eating was predicted by female gender (p=0.024; B=0.634) and working (p=0.019; B=0.306), question on night pain by female gender (p=0.049, B=0.255) and self-use of a car (p&0.001, B=0.525), and the question on stability by self-use of a car (p=0.041; B=0.434). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that each patient’s lifestyle significantly influences the importance of each of the OKS questions. This is, however, not reflected in the OKS, which in turn gives each question the same numeric value. Patients who still work and drive by themselves have given a higher value on questions that reflect these actions. This might be one of the reasons of the ceiling effect of OKS.
机译:简介:为膝关节骨关节炎的患者设计了牛津膝关节分数(OKS)。它使用12个问题来给予客观患者报告的结果措施。它是矫形社区中最常用的问卷之一。每个问题具有相同的数值,0-4,给出最大数量的48.已经观察到OKS具有显着的天花板效应,特别是在区分植入物和对准哲学之间的轻微术后差异时。假设:我们假设每个患者的每个问题都没有相同的重量,并且它取决于患者的患者的社会阶段数据和生活方式。方法:在本伦理委员会批准的前瞻性研究中,我们包括患者来到专业门诊膝关节诊所。每位患者填写了3个问卷调查问卷:人口统计数据(年龄,性别,身高,重量,BMI)以及患者最初被蒙蔽的OKS(楼梯,自用)汽车,使用行走助剂,工作,先前的手术)。然后患者填写了标准的OKS。最后,患者使用5点李克特量表给出了关于每个问题主题的重要性的记录。创建线性回归模型以预测每个问题的重量。结果:我们包括77名患者,中位数66岁(IQR 18),其中40名女性和37名男子。中位数BMI是27.7(IQR 8.2)。至于OKS相关的人口统计数据,89.6%的患者持有楼梯,70.1%仍在驾驶汽车,23.4%正在采用步行辅助工具,33.7%仍在工作和72.7%以前的膝关节手术。根据李克特量表,重量最高的问题是洗涤,夜间疼痛和稳定性(所有中位数5 [IQR 1])。重量最低的问题是步行更长的距离(中位数4 [2]),坐着后起床(中位4 [1]),跪下(中位4 [1])。高加权和低加权问题之间的差异是显着的(P& 0.001)。对于稳定性问题(p = 0.036,r = 0.239),观察到记录得分和记录的问题重量之间的弱相关性(P = 0.036,r = 0.239),以及购物问题的反向相关性(p = 0.021,r = -0.263)。在回归模型中,通过更高的年龄预测疼痛问题(P = 0.009,B = - 0.02),患者的汽车自用预测运输问题(P = 0.008,B = 0.557),问题在步行较长的时间(p = 0.02,b 0.167),重量(p = 0.33,b = -0.155)和bmi(p = 0.032,b = 0.427),女性预测吃完后的问题性别(p = 0.024; b = 0.634)和工作(p = 0.019; b = 0.306),夜间疼痛的问题由女性性别(p = 0.049,b = 0.255)和汽车自用(p& ; 0.001,b = 0.525),以及通过汽车自用稳定的问题(P = 0.041; b = 0.434)。结论:该研究表明,每个患者的生活方式都会影响每个OK问题的重要性。但是,这不是在OKS中反映的,这反过来又会给出每个问题相同的数值。仍然工作和驾驶的患者对反映这些行动的问题具有更高的价值。这可能是OKS天花板效果的原因之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号