首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine >Evaluation of supraspinatus muscle tears by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with surgical findings
【24h】

Evaluation of supraspinatus muscle tears by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with surgical findings

机译:超声检查和磁共振成像对冈上肌撕裂的评价与外科调查结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating suspected supraspinatus muscle injury compared with surgery. Subjects and methods One hundred patients underwent both US and MRI for their shoulders due to shoulder pain. Forty patients with non-improved symptoms underwent surgical exploration. We compared the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US and MRI for detection of supraspinatus pathology, using surgical findings as ‘gold standard’. Results Study included 40 patients (27 men and 13 women, age range from 20 to 68 years). US had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 92.3%, 92.6% and 92.5%, respectively in diagnosing partial thickness tears (PTT); 92.6%, 94% and 95%, respectively in diagnosing full thickness tears (FTT). MRI had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 84.6%, 92.6% and 90%, respectively in diagnosing partial thickness tears (PTT); 100%, 88.2% and 95%, respectively in diagnosing full thickness tears (FTT). There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques on one hand and surgery on the other hand in detecting both PTT and FTT. Conclusion US and MRI yield high sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy in detecting FTT. Regarding PTT rotator cuff tears both tests were less sensitive.
机译:目的探讨超声检查(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)的敏感性,特异性和诊断准确性(MRI)与手术相比评估疑似冈上肌损伤。受试者和方法患者接受过美国和MRI的肩膀,因为肩膀疼痛。四十名患者未改善症状接受手术勘探。我们将美国和MRI的敏感性,特异性和准确性进行了比较,用于检测Supraspinatus病理学,使用外科调查作为“金标准”。结果研究包括40名患者(27名男性和13名女性,年龄为20至68岁)。在诊断局部厚度泪液(PTT)时,我们的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为92.3%,92.6%和92.5%; 92.6%,94%和95%,分别诊断全厚度撕裂(FTT)。 MRI分别具有84.6%,92.6%和90%的敏感性,特异性和准确性,分别在诊断部分厚度撕裂(PTT);诊断全厚度撕裂(FTT)的100%,88.2%和95%。另一方面,在检测PTT和FTT中,两只手和手术的两种技术之间没有统计学上有显着差异。结论美国和MRI产生高灵敏度,诊断精度检测FTT。关于PTT旋转器袖口撕裂,两种测试均不太敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号