...
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Business and Management >Comparative Study of Strategic Management Schools (Prescriptive, Descriptive and Integrated)
【24h】

Comparative Study of Strategic Management Schools (Prescriptive, Descriptive and Integrated)

机译:战略管理学校的比较研究(规定,描述和综合)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article seeks to compare the schools of strategic management in three paradigms, especially descriptive and descriptive schools, and considers the integrated schools of strategic management as a combination of the other two types of schools. In this article, to achieve this goal, we first try to explain the concepts of strategic management, model, theory, approach, school and paradigm and schools of strategic management. Then, using the qualitative comparative research method and the type of close comparison, the researcher came to the conclusion that the schools of strategic management are not incomplete . They are complementary and it is necessary to use each of them in organizations. Then, we will compare the relationship between these con cepts, especially the concepts of strategic management and strategic planning, with schools of learning and planning, and finally we will find out . The prescriptive and descriptive schools are complementary and supportive according to the integrated schools.
机译:本文旨在将战略管理学校进行比较三个范式,特别是描述性和描述性学校,并认为战略管理综合学校作为其他两种学校的组合。在本文中,为了实现这一目标,我们首先尝试解释战略管理,模型,理论,方法,学校和范式和战略管理学校的概念。然后,使用定性比较研究方法和密切的比较,研究人员得出结论,战略管理学校并不完整。它们是互补的,有必要在组织中使用它们中的每一个。然后,我们将比较这些Con Cepts之间的关系,尤其是战略管理和战略规划的概念,与学习和规划学校,最后我们会发现。根据综合学校,规定和描述性学校是互补和支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号