首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Efficacy and Safety of Fire Needle Therapy for Flat Warts: Evidence from 29 Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Fire Needle Therapy for Flat Warts: Evidence from 29 Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:扁平疣的火针治疗的功效和安全性:来自29项随机对照试验的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Flat warts are a common and recurrent skin disease that has no specific antiviral treatment. As an alternative or complementary therapy, fire needle therapy has been widely used in the treatment of flat warts. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fire needle therapy for flat warts. Using the search terms “flat warts” and “fire needle,” we searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, Chinese biomedical (SinoMed) database, and the China Science and Technology Journal databases for studies until March 12, 2020. Randomized controlled trials comparing fire needle therapies with conventional therapies were also included. We calculated the risk ratios (RR) and mean differences with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We analyzed 29 trials involving 2,666 patients. Results showed that the use of fire needle therapy alone may have a higher efficacy rate compared with that of an immunomodulator (RR?=?1.11, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.20, I 2 ?=?0%, ?=?0.006; RR?=?1.19, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.37, I 2 ?=?70%, ?=?0.02, respectively) or tretinoin (RR?=?1.39, 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.55, I 2 ?=?0%, ??0.00001), with a lower risk of blisters ( ?=?0.03) or erythema ( ?=?0.04), but with a higher risk of pigmentation ( ?=?0.02). We also determined the efficacy rate of fire needle therapy in combination with traditional Chinese medicine (RR?=?1.16, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.23, I 2 ?=?21%, ??0.00001), immunomodulators (RR?=?1.17, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.28, I 2 ?=?33%, ?=?0.0005), imiquimod (RR?=?1.21, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.42, ?=?0.02), or as multidrug therapies (RR?=?1.15, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.24, I 2 ?=?0%, ?=?0.0001) and found that the combination treatments could reduce recurrence rates ( ??0.00001) and provided a lower risk of desquamation ( ?=?0.006). In conclusion, fire needle therapy seems to be effective for flat warts, with a reduced incidence of adverse events, such as blisters, erythema, and desquamation, but may increase incidence of pigmentation.
机译:扁平疣是一种常见和复发性皮肤病,其具有特异性抗病毒治疗。作为替代或互补治疗,消防针疗法已被广泛用于扁平疣的处理。本研究的目的是系统地评估防火针疗法对扁平疣的功效和安全性。使用搜索术语“扁平疣”和“消防针”,我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane,中国知识基础设施,万方数据知识服务平台,中国生物医学(SINOMED)数据库,以及中国科技期刊数据库研究到2020年3月12日至3月12日。还包括随机对照试验与常规疗法的灭火疗法进行比较。我们计算了风险比(RR)和与95%置信区间(CI)的平均差异。我们分析了29例试验,涉及2,666名患者。结果表明,与免疫调节剂(RRα= 1.11,95%CI:1.03至1.20,I 2,I 2,I 2,I 2,I 2,I 2?0%,单独使用灭火针治疗的疗效率较高的疗效率可能具有更高的疗效率rr?=?1.19,95%ci:1.03至1.37,i 2?=Δ= 70%,分别为17%,分别为Δ= 0.02)或维甲酸(Rr?=?1.39,95%Ci:1.25至1.55,I 2?= ?0%,α<0.00001),水疱风险较低(?= 0.03)或红斑(?= 0.04),但具有更高的色素沉着风险(?= 0.02)。我们还确定了消防针疗法与中药组合的疗效率(RR?=?1.16,95%CI:1.10至1.23,I 2?= 21%,α= 21%,Immunom调节剂(RR? =?1.17,95%CI:1.07至1.28,I 2?=?33%,?=?0.0005),Imiquimod(RR?=?1.21,95%CI:1.04至1.42,?=?0.02),或者多药疗法(RR?= 1.15,95%Ci:1.07至1.24,I 2?= 0%,?=?0.0001)并发现组合处理可以减少复发率(α.0.00001)并提供一个降低脱落风险(?= 0.006)。总之,消防针疗法似乎对扁平疣有效,不良事件发生率降低,如水疱,红斑和脱落,但可能会增加色素沉着的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号