首页> 外文期刊>Critical Care Research and Practice >The Performance of Equations That Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate against Measured Urinary Creatinine Clearance in Critically Ill Patients
【24h】

The Performance of Equations That Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate against Measured Urinary Creatinine Clearance in Critically Ill Patients

机译:估计肾脏过滤率的方程式对危重病人的测量尿肌酐清除

获取原文
           

摘要

The performance of glomerular filtration rate- (GFR-) estimating equations was studied against creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine collection (CrCl 24h-urine ) in critically ill patients. Methods . In this substudy of the PermiT trial ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ISRCTN68144998 ), patients from King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh who had CrCl 24h-urine were included. We estimated GFR using Cockroft–Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease study (MDRD), chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Jelliffe equations. For the CG equation, we entered the actual weight in one calculation (CG actual-wt ), and if BMI ≥30?kg/m 2 , we entered the ideal body weight (CG ideal-wt ) and the adjusted body weight (CG adjusted-wt ) in two calculations. We calculated the MDRD equation based on 4 (MDRD-4) and 6 variables (MDRD-6). The performance of these equations was assessed by different ways including Spearman correlation, bias (difference between estimated GFR and CrCl 24h-urine ), precision (standard deviation of bias), and Bland–Altman plot analysis. Results . The cohort consisted of 237 patients (age 45?±?20 years, males 75%, mechanically ventilated 99% with serum creatinine 101?±?94? μ mol/L and CrCl 24h-urine 108?±?69?ml/min/1.73?m 2 ). The correlations between the different equations and CrCl 24h-urine were modest ( r : 0.62 to 0.79; ). Bias was statistically significant for CG actual-wt (21?ml/min), CG adjusted-wt (12?ml/min), and MDRD-6 (-10?ml/min) equations. Precision ranged from 46 to 54?ml/min. The sensitivity of equations to correctly classify CrCl 24h-urine 30–59.9?ml/min/1.73?m 2 was 17.2% for CG actual-wt , 30.0% for CG ideal-wt , 31.0% for CG adjusted-wt , 31.0% for MDRD-4, 39.1% for MDRD-6, 13.8% for CKD-EPI, and 34.5% for Jelliffe equation. Conclusions . Commonly used GFR-estimating equations had limited ability to properly estimate CrCl 24h-urine and to correctly classify GFR into clinically relevant ranges that usually determine dosing of medications.
机译:研究了肾小球过滤速率 - (GFR-)估计方程的性能针对危及患者的24小时尿液收集(CRCL 24H尿液)测量的肌酐清除。方法 。在这种替换许可证试验(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/isrctn68144998)中,包括来自伯爵王的患者24h-尿的Medical City-Riyadh。我们估计了使用Cockroft-Gault(CG)的GFR,肾病研究中的饮食改性(MDRD),慢性肾病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)和JILLIFFE方程。对于CG方程,我们在一个计算中输入了实际重量(CG实际-WT),如果BMI≥30?kg / m 2,我们进入了理想的体重(Cg Ideal-wt)和调整的体重(CG调整为-WT)两种计算。我们计算了基于4(MDRD-4)和6个变量(MDRD-6)的MDRD方程。这些方程的性能由不同的方式评估,包括Spearman相关性,偏差(估计的GFR和CRCL 24h尿的差异),精确(偏差标准偏差)和Bland-Altman绘图分析。结果 。队列由237名患者(45岁(45岁)(45岁?±20年,男性75%,用血清肌酐101α±94Ω·η≤1和CrCl 24H-尿108?±69?69? /1.73?m 2)。不同方程和CRC1之间的相关性24H-尿液为适度(R:0.62至0.79;)。对于Cg实际-wt(21×ml / min),Cg调节-wt(12?ml / min)和MDRD-6(-10×mL / min)方程,偏差均有统计学意义。精度范围为46至54?ml / min。平程的敏感性来正确分类CRCL 24H尿嘧啶30-59.9?ml / min / 1.73?m 2为Cg实际-wt,30.0%的Cg Ideg-Wt,31.0%的Cg调节-wt,31.0%对于MDRD-4,MDRD-6的39.1%,CKD-EPI的13.8%,对于JILIFFE方程为34.5%。结论。常用的GFR估算方程能够适当估计CRCL 24H尿液的能力有限,并将GFR正确分类为临床相关范围,通常确定药物给药的药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号