首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Analysis of Cricket Ball Type and Innings on State Level Cricket Batter’s Performance
【24h】

Analysis of Cricket Ball Type and Innings on State Level Cricket Batter’s Performance

机译:蟋蟀球型和局限性分析州蟋蟀击球手的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this investigation was to compare the type of cricket balls utilized and innings on cricket batting performance in the First-Class Australian competition. Methods: Batting performance measures of 43 state level cricket batters were collected from two seasons of the Sheffield shield tournament (N = 60 games) that incorporated both Kookaburra? (n = 30 games) and Duke? (n = 30 games) cricket balls. Results: First-innings batting performances were significantly greater for the average number of runs scored (37.5 ± 13.4 vs. 31.2 ± 11.3), balls faced (60.7 ± 26.2 vs. 49.9 ± 23.6), boundary 4s (3.8 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 1.4) and boundary 6s (0.2 ± 0.3 vs. 0.1 ± 0.3) scored per game (p 0.05). However, significantly more wickets were taken by pace bowlers during Duke? ball games (85.0 ± 12.8% vs.76.4 ± 13.9%), while relatively more wickets were taken by spin bowlers during Kookaburra? ball games (14.2 ± 12.5% vs. 22.0 ± 14.1%; p 0.05). Conclusions: Cricket batting performance was comparable in games involving the Kookaburra ? or Duke? ball. However, pace bowlers were more successful transferring their skill to the Duke? ball, while spin bowlers were more successful with the KB? ball. Subsequently, batters may be able to effectively adapt their movement technique, and transfer their skill to the Duke? ball conditions. Future research is suggested to examine the influence of the cricket playing surface’s deterioration on cricket batter’s interceptive performance.
机译:背景:这项调查的目的是在一流的澳大利亚竞赛中比较板球击球表演的蟋蟀球和局的类型。方法:从谢菲尔德盾牌锦标赛(N = 60比赛)的两个季节收集了43个州级板球击球运动员的击球性能措施,纳入了Kookaburra? (n = 30游戏)和公爵? (n = 30游戏)板球球。结果:击球的平均运行次数的第一局击球性能明显更大(37.5±13.4与31.2±11.3),球面积(60.7±26.2与49.9±23.6),边界4S(3.8±1.9与2.9每场比赛评分±1.4)和边界6s(0.2±0.3 vs.0.1±0.3)(P 0.05)。然而,在公爵期间,步伐保龄球措施显着更多的小门?球比赛(85.0±12.8%vs.76.4±13.9%),而在Kookaburra期间旋转的保龄球手采取相对多的小门?球比赛(14.2±12.5%vs.2.0±14.1%; P <0.05)。结论:蟋蟀击球表现在涉及Kookaburra的游戏中是可比的?还是公爵?球。然而,步伐保龄球者更成功地将他们的技能转移到公爵?球,旋转保龄球们与KB更成功吗?球。随后,击球运动员可以有效地调整其运动技术,并将其技能转移到公爵?球条件。建议未来的研究审查板球比赛对板球击球手拦截性能恶化的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号